Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 11 June 2020 06:36 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905903A1756; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w0Bk2cC_SjqZ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:0:35:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C56B3A1759; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:0:35:89e1:132c:42dd:ca02] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:0:35:89e1:132c:42dd:ca02]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F8D1616D3A; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:36:30 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1591857391; bh=GnoELvOOxZtMFyQHXS99P5Rumj40ZviKodi7+KUm+BU=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=c1dI1h7bj20eK5hx7HUN+TD/YlcL+BaVCgmFBHCp+XWjb0LYOPHwC56IFaDUsq22F jp0Z7+eRpItCSPXf5WjG+cnEUFJwUsXuGOMInaoBvjidXTJ8bi4AMsjfjHYDEfeS2i DQrHILgzdfYtafNUCCYnp+Y0rGAHmiwZGXCa85vE=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <9497329C-D397-4FFB-852F-DEF207E9AEB6@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_59A0B057-461F-4ED0-8996-1CC2499A8B95"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:36:30 +0300
In-Reply-To: <0713E4D5-BAAE-44B5-840B-0A25E0399289@nohats.ca>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, "ietf108planning@ietf.org" <ietf108planning@ietf.org>, "exec-director@ietf.org" <exec-director@ietf.org>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
References: <35fb0076-a240-096a-de7f-280d5e7ad1e3@cs.tcd.ie> <0713E4D5-BAAE-44B5-840B-0A25E0399289@nohats.ca>
X-MailScanner-ID: 0F8D1616D3A.A468B
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VUYX97GTFVjCU9yHss2ZaS2EgEE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 06:36:50 -0000

Hi,

On 2020-6-11, at 2:36, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> I agree with Stephen. I’m a bit puzzled why an online meeting would need to recoup a lot of money.

because the IETF's entire funding structure is based around meeting revenues and expenses, which is historically understandable but also not a great match for the present, esp. 2020.

Some time ago, some of us tried to talk to the IAOC to revamp the funding structure to make it much more independent of meetings as the primary revenue generator, since an increasing fraction of our costs aren't directly meeting-related anymore. Some steps in that direction had already been taken (e.g., the Global Hosts), but we were arguing for a more radical revamp. That effort fizzled out, for various reasons.

Lars