IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Fri, 12 June 2020 11:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFECB3A0F8C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 04:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZA81bFjBS6am; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 04:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macbook-pro.localdomain (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95EDF3A0F8A; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 04:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <70252074-6D1C-4E37-BDCA-DA059D127BFE@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2E7AD689-3D38-4089-BCBE-7279BE6F90C6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Registration open for IETF 108
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 23:58:46 +1200
In-Reply-To: <20200612072354.GA26731@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
References: <98B3DAEE-F9B7-47C1-AE0E-4559D1572740@gmail.com> <5DE19E46-9DEA-4E93-80DD-A3C076B072DC@ietf.org> <20200612072354.GA26731@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JOpX377UMzV3tLkC5A_innWH1WE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:58:52 -0000


> On 12/06/2020, at 7:23 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> Jay,
> 
> Where did IETF loose 137,559 in sponsoring between Madrid and Virtual ?

Our sponsorship contracts for in-person meetings are very specific to in-person meetings and so when we switch an in-person meeting to online those contracts are voided.  Some do not translate to an on online meeting as they are specific to a part of the meeting that is not replicated, while others are at a lower level to recognise the different nature of the meeting.

Jay

> 
> Cheers
>    Toerless
> 
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 09:34:35PM +1200, Jay Daley wrote:
>> Tim
>> 
>>> On 11/06/2020, at 9:03 PM, Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I can see both points of view, but it would help to understand the rationale for the fee if there were some data published - and maybe I missed it - on the administrative cost of running a wholly online IETF meeting.  And whether that fee is covering purely those, or a share of the year on year administrative costs for the IETF.
>> 
>> Answers in this blog post
>> 
>> 	https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf108-registration-fees/
>> 
>> Jay
>> -- 
>> Jay Daley
>> IETF Executive Director
> 
> -- 
> ---
> tte@cs.fau.de
> 
> -- 
> Ietf108planning mailing list
> Ietf108planning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning
> 

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@ietf.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email