RE: bettering open source involvement

"MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com> Fri, 29 July 2016 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <MHammer@ag.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880F012D198 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSxIIGgb2vh3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from agwhqht.amgreetings.com (agwhqht.amgreetings.com [207.58.192.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6999A12DC1A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com ([fe80::f5de:4c30:bc26:d70a]) by USCLES531.agna.amgreetings.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:10:16 -0400
From: "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: RE: bettering open source involvement
Thread-Topic: bettering open source involvement
Thread-Index: AQHR6K32z6qsPvbhXUqzdnc9h24iiKAt7cYAgABwkICAAA6JAIAAGAIAgAAUxQCAAFqYgP//9MYwgAC8CoD//8WboIAAjUGA//+/dFA=
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:10:16 +0000
Message-ID: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05266E3193@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
References: <CAA93jw71iUPb4vuFK5sMqo_CQEE9HSkchc9988=98FKUsv_1sw@mail.gmail.com> <CABSMSPUoBGgD6ioiCOScUUEnTUnGiNAYPavONyLpbWzNcRhvsg@mail.gmail.com> <42310584-34a6-5efc-59c3-ff7e7ec77624@gmail.com> <61563BA8-6790-43DE-B670-7040F206B9C9@gmail.com> <d56478d7-ae5c-381b-fd52-ee41d9a56358@gmail.com> <e4c113cd-dd59-5e02-39ff-70cf0896bfd9@gmail.com> <16aa8266-6856-93db-9a10-e3f5f30d2b93@gmail.com> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05266E238E@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <CAG4d1rcBd7HK=Vmu3DJVd7Gat8PT-zeMvG89t30zMCwbSYjFfw@mail.gmail.com> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05266E2B91@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <m2bn1gxr22.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2bn1gxr22.wl%randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.144.15.221]
x-kse-attachmentfiltering-interceptor-info: protection disabled
x-kse-serverinfo: USCLES531.agna.amgreetings.com, 9
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean, bases: 7/29/2016 4:52:00 PM
x-kse-dlp-scaninfo: Skipped
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1QUgxw1WN_54sre_OBsgd4ve-9g>
Cc: IETF Disgust List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:10:21 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 2:01 PM
> To: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
> Cc: Alia Atlas; IETF Disgust List
> Subject: Re: bettering open source involvement
> 
> > It appears that rather than trying to find ways to reduce friction,
> > the attitude is that people must dedicate their lives to the IETF
> > alter in order to get things done. Part of this is because to some
> > extent IETF is driven by people who are paid by their organizations to
> > be full time IETFers. My company allows my participation in IETF
> > working groups (as well as other places) but does not “sponsor” it.
> > This isn’t a complaint but rather, recognition of reality. Is it any
> > wonder that so many people who get involved in the IETF because of one
> > particular thing end up walking away from standards work?
> 
> https://archive.psg.com/051000.ccr-ivtf.html

I had forgotten about that article Randy. Time flies when you're having fun.

Mike