Re: bettering open source involvement

Riccardo Bernardini <framefritti@gmail.com> Tue, 02 August 2016 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <framefritti@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03ECE12D181 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 02:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81Eg9OKpUgz0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 02:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F024F128E19 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 02:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id g62so133305387lfe.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 02:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vWfh42MBl7dg+jJJ3KLVOgrSY8/iX4wTQE9KQYZkEAA=; b=RzcuJZRV8cnRjZ689JN75xZcPcSL7z10J3+IHHnfoYnvVxjP+92JzuRj7o/07pxkue KHFRTMBq7ycf+Xc1kJX6EmVOm4ii66B8dn3++i3IgJOVl5CCXmlt36VKUWQAYUc1Hzf0 avSR97cYGI2nwMsVXmSnA4T0PkxGUu7NZwK0AQNqWmILvP+Nacg3r/hZnJcOxvlK1mY9 oAgSDaQrngwFC9hFf6qdRMzthYo6h1mCpOgwmcomj+2hjvuIGYDC+g/AtN+uUIK4WzoO GDdSaUb4JC3/6BdOCOOvweoMFYM72Yn//xJsySCSEtmwAtUcyQ3Rf2Hz+y30+xodFF5b Q57Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vWfh42MBl7dg+jJJ3KLVOgrSY8/iX4wTQE9KQYZkEAA=; b=bi1CaF6szR4aXZrnxULsT8Qfo9XOHniK67Y2PSoUHoOlyNlPRnbC6kaU9eJmyi9PQP 1UDgXelfryey1e6YO8jMFEIyro8y9WuQ3oN1nlwcF4qVdYS8vNURpHIFZpih4p04+pQN qg76s73MyUXkCMUWQdPYoyfZ4jBNBjFq8fi/gbYfAfWW5ZTHLTzcZURsjOHEx56UVfPv 7wHM+UM24Mw7nrhdTmlMslFbA4lU/9RMwtmFHY3FdvZU2aJYdG1FXsNmzBQr4mm38oWc 2X/+5ky9b/nChVc+wzao+Wd4k1yqiugbjxiqHQR+KQr9RRH6+ZfiRAKX3F74meK6vl/Q VMBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouteD5bhJoejDp1yfw3Ylf9eRSNbUq0nqyloGlHrvp81A7OuoGYAiVTWaXQ10OlSyHaYywQ1QLZ+Gs73mQ==
X-Received: by 10.46.1.163 with SMTP id f35mr18109048lji.52.1470128600105; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 02:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.144.83 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 02:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <419ab319-b43d-a705-754b-8e7f348b1f73@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <CAA93jw71iUPb4vuFK5sMqo_CQEE9HSkchc9988=98FKUsv_1sw@mail.gmail.com> <579A6B76.70303@alvarezp.org> <ADB1E7FD-115C-40DF-97BA-618CFBB1C0EF@cable.comcast.com> <52FD39F9-6362-4C1D-BCCE-40A4DFC65EA0@netapp.com> <CAA93jw5sHVshuvs85bE64Suqhv0aAZMZUV=_L0Vw2+b3W_FvNg@mail.gmail.com> <62C38CB5-B2C9-4F57-A65D-3AFBACF48745@netapp.com> <419ab319-b43d-a705-754b-8e7f348b1f73@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Riccardo Bernardini <framefritti@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:03:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CABSMSPW6f7k9KeaUuZmCgz5L=0bAufGdoO+Z_6CO-oT5HGK+tA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bettering open source involvement
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142b5e2fbc976053912fcb1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3_eBW4RQ1fGn288-SmXG8HRA0l0>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 09:03:24 -0000

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> So yes, BSD is better in the IETF context, but GPL, while problematic
> for some, is far from useless.
>

+1
I would also add that GPL'ed code could provide  a second independent
implementation, useful to check for interoperability issues.


>