IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: bettering open source involvement

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 29 July 2016 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD74112D88B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1oyOK_RQZbj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D44A12D9AD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1bTC5P-0005wf-1S; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:00:39 +0000
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 03:00:37 +0900
Message-ID: <m2bn1gxr22.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Michael Hammer <MHammer@ag.com>
Subject: Re: bettering open source involvement
In-Reply-To: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05266E2B91@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
References: <CAA93jw71iUPb4vuFK5sMqo_CQEE9HSkchc9988=98FKUsv_1sw@mail.gmail.com> <CABSMSPUoBGgD6ioiCOScUUEnTUnGiNAYPavONyLpbWzNcRhvsg@mail.gmail.com> <42310584-34a6-5efc-59c3-ff7e7ec77624@gmail.com> <61563BA8-6790-43DE-B670-7040F206B9C9@gmail.com> <d56478d7-ae5c-381b-fd52-ee41d9a56358@gmail.com> <e4c113cd-dd59-5e02-39ff-70cf0896bfd9@gmail.com> <16aa8266-6856-93db-9a10-e3f5f30d2b93@gmail.com> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05266E238E@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <CAG4d1rcBd7HK=Vmu3DJVd7Gat8PT-zeMvG89t30zMCwbSYjFfw@mail.gmail.com> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05266E2B91@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aXgZVAQ-j-g4P1bcZ6xrb5bMlwU>
Cc: IETF Disgust List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:00:44 -0000

> It appears that rather than trying to find ways to reduce friction,
> the attitude is that people must dedicate their lives to the IETF
> alter in order to get things done. Part of this is because to some
> extent IETF is driven by people who are paid by their organizations to
> be full time IETFers. My company allows my participation in IETF
> working groups (as well as other places) but does not “sponsor” it.
> This isn’t a complaint but rather, recognition of reality. Is it any
> wonder that so many people who get involved in the IETF because of one
> particular thing end up walking away from standards work?

https://archive.psg.com/051000.ccr-ivtf.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email