Re: bettering open source involvement

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 01 August 2016 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B1912D7F4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v0RyQ34rf0xh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A6E612D137 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3s31m82fFJz3HP; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 16:23:52 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1470061432; bh=cfgL/8VRLJbiMBDNxC/8brrBr1GxM2OpcPIj3E/6mVc=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=l6dYzsR3o/WOAlQDHSO2+GEx/poDEoF7c370OeNP2uZl6DOwZhDXQGb9wQjhpcUz8 Hb+UFIeqZdP51ueuFJx7/Ps4JCmW253Bzqr8uW+73Vrl/a6d+/bmU8GMHNm6MVsY5I 0jc3zZGZSO4hwFJPgqY83MAU1AtBHyfTpzkcxkAs=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ue8gQ0iA5Hf8; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 16:23:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 16:23:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.94.105.158] (unknown [174.113.172.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 304B9393BF7; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:23:49 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca 304B9393BF7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: bettering open source involvement
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13F69)
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rdZ8E_2Ozo4wu4sTenGdsrF518N7nbzxc3q8-bjyS0JgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:23:47 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8F049C6F-F581-44EB-A6AD-A43481507F63@nohats.ca>
References: <CAA93jw71iUPb4vuFK5sMqo_CQEE9HSkchc9988=98FKUsv_1sw@mail.gmail.com> <579A6B76.70303@alvarezp.org> <ADB1E7FD-115C-40DF-97BA-618CFBB1C0EF@cable.comcast.com> <CAG4d1rdZ8E_2Ozo4wu4sTenGdsrF518N7nbzxc3q8-bjyS0JgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rCeKnhAcfFkblAEcswDYxV7PVZE>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:24:18 -0000

> On Aug 1, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> One concern would be keeping multiple implementations really happening and also being clear on what are implementation choices versus interoperable issues.

Yes, let's not forget how hard it was to get alternatives for bind to break a very dangerous monoculture in DNS.

Paul