Re: [Internetgovtech] Contracts, what problems we are solving (Was: Re: Transition to the web)

Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Mon, 14 July 2014 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5427E1B27B3 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Or0fu4PT77dI for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x233.google.com (mail-qc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CC1A1A0118 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r5so3430778qcx.10 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=2eZy746AFbxZpXpgF/7LQRdOv03ENbnXBkZhpJENvig=; b=H5SL9nfdSMbO0I4T6j2CwvVK6wsqXuUYMYsiLtCks275qpt8TOfRjXR0U+cRRquwMS tpIxm8ot6ZlsOw1olDaQSS/HldEZSDWg0XUzzGw3nMOCMQ9Q0oB2gd4fu0AnlpMDs1DM SV96Ec7DKZiQ/SYJiUF3Badscqy1Ouy/s6MGiOHkq0OBXfUfjh9rawj5EWKhRg9HrjMD bq60iMDRylNVWvmpHBlg/rldh6POrylT1kbvLXI9nQQO4i+7InAHxna3GdGkbTCEwyOR sphXUhhzH3Ij96bMO6nUBuYlo0wr6ZBWq5jpKwVbTUeHzd+O43ukrb2+JXE38nizAADa d9rA==
X-Received: by 10.140.102.142 with SMTP id w14mr21710108qge.101.1405373714548; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.147.15 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53C440BC.7010406@dcrocker.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140708142055.0d5fbb78@elandnews.com> <20140709161653.GM59034@mx1.yitter.info> <9B506E73B33873103AE5EC52@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20140709171401.GB2935@mx1.yitter.info> <53BD843F.1070304@cs.tcd.ie> <53BD84BB.7000002@meetinghouse.net> <53BDA867.7090701@gmail.com> <53BE602F.7020108@firsthand.net> <53BE6384.5030504@cs.tcd.ie> <53BE69D2.9070509@firsthand.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20140711000259.0cc016e8@resistor.net> <53BFD828.3070007@firsthand.net> <53C06E7C.4010903@gmail.com> <CAD_dc6ihUvV8SDkmoc3fGHWoOoR6nFhRz-=tgCjKnuNvRO2JXw@mail.gmail.com> <53C0F1D9.3090400@cisco.com> <53C17B5C.4090600@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <C5750A628D4D973F3C44F6DC@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <53C1B2C6.40501@meetinghouse.net> <72F8472D-2913-4BEC-9260-6DAC7791BBF8@virtualized.org> <53C1DD6C.8030501@gmail.com> <43DD1894-54A8-44D0-AE58-6F3D395F43DD@ericsson.com> <53C4000C.4030401@dcrocker.net> <53C41C78.1090006@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <53C4405B.7010002@gmail.com> <53C440BC.7010406@dcrocker.net>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 22:34:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6hv7a8TcrSHj_OHUDvLSZN9n4AN_8ONtaNrAJvWnqoLNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c163e008504104fe2e1120"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/A8H-Hn1qL3s8eOn5GTVfsvKV7AE
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Contracts, what problems we are solving (Was: Re: Transition to the web)
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:35:17 -0000

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 7/14/2014 1:40 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > Why does the arcane way that the NTIA contracts worked matter for
> > the future? We all know that the competitive appearance was just that
> > and nothing to do with reality. The question now is about teeth for
> > the watchdog.
>
>
> An important source of useful teeth is the reality of competitive
> bidding.  That is, competitive bidding that is... you know... competitive.
>
> Would you classify the agreement with ICANN on protocol parameters as
being competitive? maybe not, but i am sure ICANN knows that the agreement
got teeth.

Cheers!

> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internetgovtech mailing list
> Internetgovtech@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech
>



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !