Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web

"Lynn St.Amour" <Lynn@LStAmour.org> Thu, 10 July 2014 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <lynn@lstamour.org>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4621B2A21 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AhlaTCwYceeZ for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa06-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa06-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.110]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6591B29FA for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from isoc-rem-mbp2227.home ([96.237.230.184]) by p3plsmtpa06-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id QlFR1o00D3zMm3C01lFS1w; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:15:27 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: "Lynn St.Amour" <Lynn@LStAmour.org>
In-Reply-To: <53BEFBA1.4010504@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:15:25 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F08BAFAF-4847-412A-9ABF-90B9D58C916B@LStAmour.org>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140708142055.0d5fbb78@elandnews.com> <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3998608C6@BK-EXCHMBX01.blacknight.local> <20140709161653.GM59034@mx1.yitter.info> <9B506E73B33873103AE5EC52@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20140709171401.GB2935@mx1.yitter.info> <F7FBC1F2-F1E5-4BAC-9B7C-F55F0069D9CB@LStAmour.org> <53BEFBA1.4010504@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/ZT30LlNGHNnGgUgOGd7-SimJy1s
Cc: "internetgovtech@iab.org" <internetgovtech@iab.org>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 21:15:31 -0000

Hi Dave,

thanks for thinking of me :^).

Frankly, I was thinking of a fairly short peer-to-peer note.  Simply saying there are concerns, they have been quite well expressed on this list, and that we wanted to ensure Fadi/ICANN senior management was aware.  No need to hand hold here.   And, until we know ICANN senior management is aware, we do not need to treat this as intentional.

On the other hand, an equally reasonable course of action would be for one of the ICANN staffers on this list to bring it to ICANN senior management's attention and then "someone" gets back to the list.

We are using a lot of cycles talking around something that should be addressed directly, and probably as Andrew says elsewhere.

But, this is just my .02.

Lynn




On Jul 10, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 7/9/2014 12:18 PM, Lynn St.Amour wrote:
>> In thinking about how to turn this around, what if a few key people
>> (say IETF and IAB Chairs) were to write to Fadi and some of his key
>> advisors and suggest they reconsider their recent actions given how
>> counter this is to so many principles.  ICANN senior staff may just
>> not be aware of this.
> 
> 
> (noting some additional postings about this today....)
> 
> 
> The major challenge in such a note is for it to be clear, direct,
> critical and careful.  That is, it needs to explain the points of
> concern and the alternatives being recommended.  It needs to be both
> comprehensive and concise, while maintaining a neutral tone about
> competence or intent, lest our own communication to them appear
> ham-fisted...
> 
> So you'd be a good one to write the draft.
> 
> And having it be signed by an aggregation of IETF community leadership
> makes sense.
> 
> d/
> -- 
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
> 
> -- 
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internetgovtech mailing list
> Internetgovtech@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech