IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] Contracts, what problems we are solving (Was: Re: Transition to the web)

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Tue, 15 July 2014 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EC51A0AE3 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ta_itEvuL3WO for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com (mail-pd0-f173.google.com [209.85.192.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11F171A0AE1 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w10so227817pde.32 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=zUJ2lhgtqZX/eJ+YSFlyPzqJkb03CInph1e9p0heuss=; b=AurkY7yNpOPkdnwIIII8e8HYusBam66egxwsWAYIUtkVC22zBj4UjZf71uEVmbsKy1 jpp5ph1tLHdXxKyHxAQTP3gH5s1nEfsr8J79U8wnp7/hkcG1VgmpeMFRvmrFQTJSr3Iy VmPHV3uNecWlnrtqP8qYWpNG28pJutN6fvlQiOunYDJCv6MhPx/QaJL8rvi1Yzt22Emr vUnuvHCB/wS+9VtQQVDzzbSPTSkT4yz04aeWSyHQPtnQqPWUpY6dpMeqNNC5nu+ZDiAW 6Yv6hrNpkdnG4Kqq2P5i1GVyPqbPXb2IfvWJnyWRm0BDJI5j4haABegYTroa6tKgtYnq vO6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlCQ53MqaFd2iLz1GBwoTeuOKlfmfpJ2xUo86MOHUltQstLXJdZy4srvx3QoFQIx+Y5hO11
X-Received: by 10.68.57.175 with SMTP id j15mr2452986pbq.164.1405447289875; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (c-24-6-168-86.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.168.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hl1sm19467598pdb.41.2014.07.15.11.01.27 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ACF1FB6E-3488-4B46-AC70-D5A0766C6ED2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20140715100237.08757120@resistor.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:01:25 -0700
Message-Id: <133C8BA9-EEC5-48A2-941D-61E9E6371BD3@virtualized.org>
References: <53C06E7C.4010903@gmail.com> <CAD_dc6ihUvV8SDkmoc3fGHWoOoR6nFhRz-=tgCjKnuNvRO2JXw@mail.gmail.com> <53C0F1D9.3090400@cisco.com> <53C17B5C.4090600@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <C5750A628D4D973F3C44F6DC@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <53C1B2C6.40501@meetinghouse.net> <72F8472D-2913-4BEC-9260-6DAC7791BBF8@virtualized.org> <53C1DD6C.8030501@gmail.com> <43DD1894-54A8-44D0-AE58-6F3D395F43DD@ericsson.com> <53C4000C.4030401@dcrocker.net> <20140715142048.GE8847@mx1.yitter.info> <6.2.5.6.2.20140715100237.08757120@resistor.net>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/kYyCW_i_Qfb5zxWvR05CWomQ-24
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Contracts, what problems we are solving (Was: Re: Transition to the web)
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:01:34 -0000

Hi,

On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:31 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
>> That is, it's nice of ICANN
>> to provide us this service for free right now, and it's also really
>> great that they do a good, satisfying job.  If that should cease to be
>> the case, of course, the IAB could inform ICANN that we were making a
>> change, and then we could just start publishing the data on a
>> different set of web pages published somewhere else.  

Given the various references (some hardwired?) to IANA.ORG, that might get a bit confusing. Perhaps it might be important to ensure that there be a clear understanding that the IANA.ORG domain name is 'owned' by the IAB/IETF and/or associated with the protocol parameters function?

>> This has been the IETF and IAB position all along, and at
>> the igovupdate BoF in London we heard the Chair of the ICANN Board say
>> quite the same thing.  So, I don't think there's any real issue there.
> 
> There are eleven other groups represented in the discussions.  The ICANN Board is not part of those groups.  If there isn't anyone who would disagree with that conclusion it may help if that position could be expressed publicly.  

Well, the position was expressed publicly (it's in the transcript of the igovupdate session).  Perhaps you mean expressed formally in writing?

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email