IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 10 July 2014 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5845B1A0AB6 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vvXWD7bqYri for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C40161B2920 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (nat-07-mht.dyndns.com [216.146.45.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 190168A031 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:15:09 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: internetgovtech@iab.org
Message-ID: <20140710151509.GH4720@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <20140709171401.GB2935@mx1.yitter.info> <53BD843F.1070304@cs.tcd.ie> <53BD84BB.7000002@meetinghouse.net> <53BDA867.7090701@gmail.com> <53BE602F.7020108@firsthand.net> <53BE6384.5030504@cs.tcd.ie> <53BE77FB.5080705@acm.org> <25D6CC36-C17D-4613-9F4E-F9CC3C6714B6@isoc.org> <53BE99B6.3030604@cisco.com> <FA0F27D5-5060-48D1-9F21-4938662F803A@isoc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FA0F27D5-5060-48D1-9F21-4938662F803A@isoc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/VRzYz9HEMd0nWqfxx_Kl9B1X7jg
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:16:14 -0000

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:30:47PM +0000, Dan York wrote:
> 
> 1. Do we want ICANN to reinstate the ianatransition email list?

As I think I've argued before, I don't especially care.  I believe
that the co-ordination group is supposed to be an ultra-lightweight
process that just allows the different communities to work
independently on their respective areas of interest.  We don't
actually need a single all-IANA-topics list or forum or any such thing
at all.

But _ICANN_ needs a list, or a forum, or something.  The names
community need to work on its stuff.  But determining their needs and
so on is just not a suitable topic for this (IAB) list.
 
Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email