Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 07 May 2019 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000B012018D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 09:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UfEZZsoO733Z for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 09:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 142A812018B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2019 09:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id o25so10140569wmf.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 May 2019 09:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=a5lVlD5Px72EQUMEkrTO10iXzO/WPyj57Gh4jmcRQzY=; b=qg2FQzyLgGotewrRfHfpHCV0qlLRLpHcOHsnF2mqocRQXM0y+mXLrcLOcEgpe7GzU2 LRx6Q69mklikeiE5jKMgKvFb0CF9fEaU4q1VMb1dZ6t4GnrgFhyjCyCBOYgDV8WIPggt 1WXZSRlWOGJJ+YeeYokbkJUpaeLxMaBLkUBq05OcasMcj7ORBy9gaKvwwicUzo0337t0 O1B/9fr4Xg4xmTYmwAch5VvG4edg8ra050j0giLGUwMBpd0/LttQpE/RUm1Lo7h6lIAn lwpU1/C2lLkDuLfKFIk4lR2IeaZh1KWttN5k7n4XEfyys+t2BFHXGao1y2LDo9KlWugn RWCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=a5lVlD5Px72EQUMEkrTO10iXzO/WPyj57Gh4jmcRQzY=; b=sHg6WbDn75qGiHIR9LRJLtnbEyi6iRqBhKuNjoWk85Y48YrpRWKBEB1HPWOo1pzrby SKNRAtZYrZJdqOA9Iz0Pf0Fz+0xsAmDwcHTixisegDQjEweNVSk/4+VtmsyTcOHhtMBV 23HyjfPxRmCaAuQLtgMP/SNj6ID5o1PAd9u69qGdcMYQa168jRbQR2nHYkS9ry2hn3f9 KeVeVzX6GDvGjOPYlih1s5oY3yQlD8lIaiosV/3KaVNf2QxDcQOPW+40pav/RBdJ8Z8U 3uTSDozZ5P3fXadVwvzofgDyB2q5Q0oeEyPDwTFFnVCM6yj3I0LGksWBov12xcvFi2pH Qopw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPoNCDI3EgDr+GwLLb9wp6mUvsUnCXbU9I2rqmO0wCuV48HS/8 7gkGQSy53xk+flxfJj97D3A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxg2euyrnv+SCwOuCCWRO6q/9Qfgo9SK/+wWdA18QUdyqD857T+Sk7rzcogPK1B+uPhd0WyGA==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7e87:: with SMTP id z129mr17800060wmc.145.1557246674478; Tue, 07 May 2019 09:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.199] (c-24-5-53-184.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.53.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l127sm16236228wml.40.2019.05.07.09.31.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 May 2019 09:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
Subject: Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51F2BD2A-A590-4AF1-B8C1-FE62C9416340@steffann.nl>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 09:31:09 -0700
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8C63324F-FEF6-40BD-B918-B413CDEF9186@gmail.com>
References: <F8BFFCAD-E58E-4736-8A1C-56579B6F6032@employees.org> <a2465e81-a17f-ab48-efda-20fe12a70077@foobar.org> <30239E0C-C444-4A7E-8342-AEE47BF8A2BB@employees.org> <20190505200449.GB7546@vurt.meerval.net> <80073906-c3c0-1f22-9e7f-c2b349063936@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xzVW3m0mN7jEn8SYyYCYhrufVnkfp3rBjJcijBkvucNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC-35yVYXSRR0sRL-MBMHyOFZtJx9E9h14G8qqVh5T7qGA@mail.gmail.com> <232c1a43-0fd9-4eae-737b-260a3906f72a@gmail.com> <51F2BD2A-A590-4AF1-B8C1-FE62C9416340@steffann.nl>
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ATUiWdKvDbYFg7Y_socm5Mv5vRE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 16:31:18 -0000

Sander,

> On May 7, 2019, at 5:41 AM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
>> Job, I don't think there is any failure of communication. It's
>> clear enough that you (and Nick and Sander) have reached the
>> conclusion that the operational costs of the proposal greatly
>> exceed its value. Other people have reached the opposite
>> conclusion.
> 
> This proposal weighs advantages to a relatively low number of mobile (and maybe enterprise) networks against having to deal with any resulting operational issues in millions of unmanaged home networks.

Enterprise networks are an important use case for this proposal.

The draft seems to me to be clear it is focused on managed networks.   It uses the word “administrator” 12 times.   There is, of course, no administrator on unmanaged networks.

Would it help if the draft said the focus is for managed networks?

Bob


> 
> I understand the people arguing in favour of this. I see that it would make their lives easier, save some battery life etc. But I work a lot with the smaller ISPs and their customers. I know first hand how incredibly hard it is to do remote debugging in an unmanaged third-party network. When the internet was a research project, an academic network and even a business network, I would love to see this draft. But now that the IETF makes protocols that extend into the domains of people who don't have any networking clue we have a duty to make our protocols easy to use, understand and debug. Protocols that are extremely resilient in those domains. And this draft goes against all that.
> 
> Please don't pretend that the IETF makes protocols for network engineers, and listen to the rest of the user base and their representatives as well.
> 
> Cheers,
> Sander
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------