IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05

"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Tue, 07 May 2019 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B14120234 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4mwGzFLy7Sre for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 11:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C517120228 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2019 11:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 397FC8D4A129; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:33:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE57DE70826; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de
Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GKFjXdC01wb3; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:33:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.110] (unknown [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31:2ef0:eeff:fe03:ee34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0D37E70812; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:33:50 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 18:33:50 +0000
X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6135)
Message-ID: <96B31234-D3BE-49C3-A1A6-129FF62039A6@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1hO4j3-0000IYC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
References: <F8BFFCAD-E58E-4736-8A1C-56579B6F6032@employees.org> <a2465e81-a17f-ab48-efda-20fe12a70077@foobar.org> <30239E0C-C444-4A7E-8342-AEE47BF8A2BB@employees.org> <20190505200449.GB7546@vurt.meerval.net> <80073906-c3c0-1f22-9e7f-c2b349063936@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xzVW3m0mN7jEn8SYyYCYhrufVnkfp3rBjJcijBkvucNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC-35yVYXSRR0sRL-MBMHyOFZtJx9E9h14G8qqVh5T7qGA@mail.gmail.com> <232c1a43-0fd9-4eae-737b-260a3906f72a@gmail.com> <51F2BD2A-A590-4AF1-B8C1-FE62C9416340@steffann.nl> <8C63324F-FEF6-40BD-B918-B413CDEF9186@gmail.com> <BC988F7C-B262-4FF3-929A-02E6BCCE2266@steffann.nl> <BC23F51B-4135-47C6-B22F-8AE5CD8CB6F6@lists.zabbadoz.net> <m1hO4j3-0000IYC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/n3XT2OqxT0tWXkZnBc7hgMvY1qs>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 18:33:58 -0000

On 7 May 2019, at 18:21, Philip Homburg wrote:

> But nobody is doing any work on what IPv4 should look like in the 
> future.

You mean inside the IETF given sunset4 was concluded without conclusion?


What does SNA, Frame Relay, FDDI, Token Ring, … ok bad examples … 
what does IPX/SPX, Appletalk, VINES IP, XNS, NetBIOS, .. look like 
today?  Should we assume IPv4 will have a different fate?

/bz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email