Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05

[Mark Smith <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 06:25, Nick Hilliard <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Ole Troan wrote on 29/04/2019 13:01:
> > On 29 Apr 2019, at 13:03, Nick Hilliard <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >> So, is this ID proceeding on a point of procedure at this point?
> >> I.e. is the the slate going to be wiped clean every time an update
> >> is issued, no matter how minor, and all previous objections are
> >> automatically invalidated?
> >
> > Yes, I think that's a somewhat correct reading of working group
> > process.
>
> Ok.  Frustrating for all.
>
> > If I read you correctly, you don't think there is anything that can
> > be done with this document to fix those objections. And that the
> > only outcome is to retire the document?
>
> That would be the gist of it, yeah.
>

"Very few of the objections I've raised over the last 18 months have
actually been addressed to the point that I'm happy with them.  I didn't
raise them again in -05 because I assumed that they were still
outstanding, as they were neither addressed adequately on the mailing
list or in the draft itself."

You were never going to be happy with them. You've been arguing in bad faith.







> > I was also surprised by the lack of resistance in the room. Therefore
> > the extra confirmation on the mailing list.
>
> Lots of us can't get to ietf meetings. :-(
>
> Nick
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [e-mail]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------