IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Mon, 29 April 2019 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D972812038A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xYQpt092DDtM for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F96412066C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: ipv6@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x3TLZCBr017062 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 22:35:13 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
Subject: Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <F8BFFCAD-E58E-4736-8A1C-56579B6F6032@employees.org>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <afe9b382-259b-805a-2bd2-23c0e0f762b7@foobar.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 22:35:11 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/6.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F8BFFCAD-E58E-4736-8A1C-56579B6F6032@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Wgjt8bjtLhjbyJrVxHQaUXXZprE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:35:21 -0000

Ole Troan wrote on 29/04/2019 11:02:
> At the 6man meeting at IETF 104 in Prague there was support to close the working group last call and advance
> draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05 to the IESG.
> 
> This call is to confirm that decision on the mailing list.
> 
> Please give objections and comments to this decision to the mailing list, by 2019-05-13.

Ole,

All the comments in this summary email still hold:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/lZ6ScXew_7q-BeVOK8L1dHEpVAc

Is a reference to the URL considered to be a valid objection, or do the 
contents need to be pasted into an email to be considered valid?

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email