IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Tue, 30 April 2019 00:12 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C5A1200CE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U32pvKe9PtOc for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D3B120052 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id l203so9875716oia.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bn+qTUsAP8ztDwm4ecEE/Aqi1fs4ELqDxwKMUcjniC8=; b=eeniZkAy1RXvkxSEINX3IIIRA0en6ROmS78GdGcolEB0rCb1Q925odi0HGiuv3BFKx 4tju20ZMWpSIVNTtvj6LooemzbUPxlQ3nDFQ32joQf8FEhW0EHFjtZtwBvcmnKgPL9OK 0C3ZZdx6t4WBvXQrU3Gl6bE2y39snqxxV4RhZqKPqpLRjiuY9JJ1h1N9A2ZAK8eXMONQ 7zWo/kJHdxBVuvusroTN+7Nmw1Fb5hvREJ21BRWDkUL6PggvbD7ju9UsMIBnF6DKjw5G 1O+PgFAQY6QlbS8e8qtfv4yxQea8CtnqLm37wVSlmRgxMbnPdygltGH/HKq7EIaMK5H+ 7p8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bn+qTUsAP8ztDwm4ecEE/Aqi1fs4ELqDxwKMUcjniC8=; b=lU7Qij53M13jzC6LeFioUxQIbmh7e0giKoCLiaSOYJZKH4xcabFUgp60wetDshyVYy sFIDsZ/OmUdT05SoIyQ7mIq5bZwpsT3CAYw3YxPfPCnxo9HKzfJYZcXnmndMtzsrgd8i /2Sn8FmSG7UF6Wd4rj6Oj3mq1KKPBE763ua2JizvYSu0b64zvb44RZ14wMsqbhh1Unxe YW+48as+/C3n+WNpm9LOQkIWkVNvrtP4uOgUNZl3bq1psf1La7dnVxGdTYTsH4pIMf7r uUSHePIm//1ikqgS3UGV+fS6uA3xnYZlr4dT2GVKpdzyBK5sOUrrFuBMgh9mNW3UkDLO oMXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUVEpTcxExsHNKZitIIymDnvxsy092F+BU718Ho6mO4nJngRaHs fRfnGPmwmmXx1gaFAkam0J8ABK6EE7nzei0zNm5Nyw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDL4ygcssq9QNrn2ACvWCi89S7QEikGFSs9Db3ANRwzz5MyfB1HVKazSW2rtAab5K9ynmi2KvA0MSi6D+1l9Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:307:: with SMTP id i7mr1214616oie.60.1556583150990; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <F8BFFCAD-E58E-4736-8A1C-56579B6F6032@employees.org> <a2465e81-a17f-ab48-efda-20fe12a70077@foobar.org> <22774.1556560887@localhost> <m1hLB3s-0000ItC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1hLB3s-0000ItC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:12:19 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2y0L7pJqKxmLsQCmm393h29auMzBRvFPGC+Qg_G-vO45w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05
To: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c74d120587b4418d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/e7XZje6MRiTLzMW4205NrFYmzA8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:12:33 -0000

On Tue., 30 Apr. 2019, 04:32 Philip Homburg, <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
wrote:

> >I think that the objectors have been rather few, have been unreasonably
> loud
> >and very repetitive.
>
> Here is the opinion of operators at the RIPE meeting last fall:
> https://ripe77.ripe.net/archives/video/2335/
> Reactions at 5:38
>

How many have read the draft?

Should they be making judgement and we accept judgement based on a short
and single presentation by somebody who has a bias against it?

Have they seen a presentation from somebody who is for it?



> Of course in true tradition of the IETF, operator input is mostly ignored.
>

I think this is approaching an appeal to authority.




>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email