IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Sun, 05 May 2019 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C1A1200CD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 May 2019 13:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hL5X-13RmUKA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 May 2019 13:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-f47.google.com (mail-yw1-f47.google.com [209.85.161.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F05C120073 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 May 2019 13:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 18so4035521ywe.7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 May 2019 13:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TVnbwb3+tDKd6K3F33ri0dEcBgcKdsF34KwRYeShVJ4=; b=c7uBYU4akEEFiWYCaawoDnS3p1Avhp88eJBk2tDHz4ZGe9PgSMEr18nbX+wppubV/z YGG0Tb428WqM30Qic7ZNw05xDY48pA3ueW+reI6Hb5HZGIgVTo28X79RbvJxLlPUiQmr JrdJi4YvzfG0GBZlxSl20fbTxLzkeXDheCVZcUseysSUv8ISDnbPzeadvpmHVZPo0uPv 6XUFKUYgIa5PwXiSNI0WloxZWT2ZoUfNnLsI2FBd0vGUDg49HSLUX9wwDYa/9ZHh5vBH bIWe66PpkvtvVbsb1BmHnMw5YkIRF9nPh0aUE6r6y9MwSday+nTReCZXIjRXqIcXVTqL WUJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAULR7PUEBIWhaD3A6VuQFtDMC0IjdJXnpxvIewiZPVp0pBhku7V gPoIVBqKUdGjuW1B7NyR2EBznMQdQL9P4A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyv0GR/hTfQjXfv4tqZMYkWdmsgq7K+RYkvbYHN/V+WEddBv9mm+TcE+cQgdxaHnLNl67DfyQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a81:3253:: with SMTP id y80mr15954645ywy.462.1557086692909; Sun, 05 May 2019 13:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vurt.meerval.net ([179.51.74.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm2675062ywf.2.2019.05.05.13.04.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 05 May 2019 13:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vurt.meerval.net [local]) by vurt.meerval.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 72e0c8d4; Sun, 5 May 2019 20:04:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 20:04:49 +0000
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05
Message-ID: <20190505200449.GB7546@vurt.meerval.net>
References: <F8BFFCAD-E58E-4736-8A1C-56579B6F6032@employees.org> <a2465e81-a17f-ab48-efda-20fe12a70077@foobar.org> <30239E0C-C444-4A7E-8342-AEE47BF8A2BB@employees.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <30239E0C-C444-4A7E-8342-AEE47BF8A2BB@employees.org>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/qt_g35z7aXEwDEyrrLJFUdaglQk>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 20:04:57 -0000

Dear Ole,

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:01:43PM +0200, Ole Troan wrote:
> > On 29 Apr 2019, at 13:03, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> > 
> > So, is this ID proceeding on a point of procedure at this point?
> > I.e. is the the slate going to be wiped clean every time an update
> > is issued, no matter how minor, and all previous objections are
> > automatically invalidated?
> 
> Yes, I think that's a somewhat correct reading of working group process.

No.

This interpretation of the working group process is flawed. This is not
all how IETF works.

If we consider "no matter how minor" as just changing the version number
of a draft, we should all be able to see that the act of merely bumping
the version number of a draft absolutely is not an adequate
implementation of "addressing outstanding issues".

Concerns are addressed through dialogue and substantial change to an
Internet Draft.

Conceding when there is a real outstanding technical objection is not
coming to consensus.

The misuse of process has been brought up before
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/GAIeuDbH3q1u9YQvQLHYaYK4sXU
It gives me great cause for alarm to observe these proceedings.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email