Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05

[Philip Homburg <[e-mail]>]

In your letter dated Thu, 9 May 2019 11:08:03 +0200 (CEST) you wrote:
>An attaching host will not start IPv4 operations until it has received 
>(and decided it's received all of them) RA answers to its initial RS 
>message, because before this it doesn't know what the flag will be. This 
>will increase attachment times before a working setup can be had on IPv4 
>only links. I think this is a valid concern.

I think the proponents of this draft should create an experimental 
implementation in a mobile device (for example Andriod, but I guess a 
laptop running Linux would work as well).

And then actually try to attack that implementation and write both about
implementation guidelines and security issues.

Much better would be to just drop this draft and move on.