IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05

Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com> Mon, 29 April 2019 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D7D120129 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ATFbsFSg2OlC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo6-tun.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2001:888:1044:10:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F98E12011E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) (Smail #157) id m1hLB3s-0000ItC; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:31:32 +0200
Message-Id: <m1hLB3s-0000ItC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05
From: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <F8BFFCAD-E58E-4736-8A1C-56579B6F6032@employees.org> <a2465e81-a17f-ab48-efda-20fe12a70077@foobar.org> <22774.1556560887@localhost>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:01:27 -0400 ." <22774.1556560887@localhost>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:31:30 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/aC6q6vqH835Us0DrnEIkyaqBi0g>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:31:38 -0000

>I think that the objectors have been rather few, have been unreasonably loud
>and very repetitive.  

Here is the opinion of operators at the RIPE meeting last fall:
https://ripe77.ripe.net/archives/video/2335/
Reactions at 5:38

Of course in true tradition of the IETF, operator input is mostly ignored.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email