IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Tue, 30 April 2019 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFE3120104 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pGZ2KmsT6HB8 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3183B120006 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BFB4C; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:17:39 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date:date :in-reply-to:x-mailer:from:from:subject:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1556623056; bh=0bsyedkhRYeo9pi9Q27NNUeuxmAsHDaaDU6mTtjAGso=; b=A pkzBbVsEQjaUGduSToP4MkEdJ+ZHRHJw5IQ6GPF2BNhSpx4al10iADCQXkLaQc7H oWYW72DFP7lhNw5QnO/mOt8HzUb7DgTLKxVCBMsWDXnupVwcgYpqEWahbkTvePsX WW7RgoPJ2h/Vhp6mpB0l4CpwkEVEPCWFGHbKMfRm2Y=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id FUBkzM4Ze_Ir; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:17:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:310f:ce24:3e12:4c0a] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:310f:ce24:3e12:4c0a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 386FA4A; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:17:36 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16E227)
In-Reply-To: <CANMZLAYh+V57yrWOzmUyjSMK0g95u1D5_GZmyZBMOMKAZnrnCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:17:35 +0200
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3F474511-6FE3-4A0A-9B84-7C37F08FBB5D@steffann.nl>
References: <F8BFFCAD-E58E-4736-8A1C-56579B6F6032@employees.org> <a2465e81-a17f-ab48-efda-20fe12a70077@foobar.org> <30239E0C-C444-4A7E-8342-AEE47BF8A2BB@employees.org> <8b9fd743-bfcc-525c-98f6-154f3fa713cc@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2zEWvt9NyemMb8H0AEvPvmNSDGa4wcXiS6n5yRxNFCHQg@mail.gmail.com> <c7e18765-be04-6494-8193-984dbccb520b@foobar.org> <CANMZLAYh+V57yrWOzmUyjSMK0g95u1D5_GZmyZBMOMKAZnrnCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Hn6MpSUV46ru9siy59La_bGHqRc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:17:42 -0000

Hello Brian

> FWIW I agree that Nick has been arguing consistently. The authors got that he doesn't like the idea :)

And Nick is not alone. I consider this draft to be harmful and oppose it's fundamental idea. There is no rule that bad drafts can't be opposed because we can't suggest text to "fix" our objections.

You asked for something actionable: withdraw it. Its cost far outweigh its benefits.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email