IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Tue, 07 May 2019 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A58120196 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 09:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iht88Bfd4xkK for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 09:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F5012018A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2019 09:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FA74A; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:54:12 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date:date :in-reply-to:x-mailer:from:from:subject:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1557248050; bh=Pd6sz1L/UivSaZXjkpFPLgE1a9C/oL+LoycAW87GO3k=; b=W KwNSpy/MRnOWIorhw2Lv3etusvGVlOG2NdU76qfkyZ8OqE4z4yz9cfm7kxKehuqF vpSdmktqRfURb92SpTyHjDNVlaFVKuoz6l0usWO24YnZqXShm8AwYPpDjRCor3tp jYexOroURCVgCRcFr82Botj4d9IlvaTznvSGbIUd+Y=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Mdc53h4etcVj; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:54:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.180.62.126] (unknown [89.200.47.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DE1C49; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:54:10 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16E227)
In-Reply-To: <8C63324F-FEF6-40BD-B918-B413CDEF9186@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 18:54:08 +0200
Cc: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BC988F7C-B262-4FF3-929A-02E6BCCE2266@steffann.nl>
References: <F8BFFCAD-E58E-4736-8A1C-56579B6F6032@employees.org> <a2465e81-a17f-ab48-efda-20fe12a70077@foobar.org> <30239E0C-C444-4A7E-8342-AEE47BF8A2BB@employees.org> <20190505200449.GB7546@vurt.meerval.net> <80073906-c3c0-1f22-9e7f-c2b349063936@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xzVW3m0mN7jEn8SYyYCYhrufVnkfp3rBjJcijBkvucNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC-35yVYXSRR0sRL-MBMHyOFZtJx9E9h14G8qqVh5T7qGA@mail.gmail.com> <232c1a43-0fd9-4eae-737b-260a3906f72a@gmail.com> <51F2BD2A-A590-4AF1-B8C1-FE62C9416340@steffann.nl> <8C63324F-FEF6-40BD-B918-B413CDEF9186@gmail.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/GHKK-uqKV46IF39uUmOLSRNiPbE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 16:54:17 -0000

Hi Bob,

> Would it help if the draft said the focus is for managed networks?

Hmm. Just stating where it's supposed to be used doesn't prevent abuse in other situations. If we can actually limit the potential impact on devices on unmanaged networks then that would be great.

I understand this is not easy, as the same devices will be used on both networks.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email