Re: Alternatives to the flag (Was:Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05)

"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Thu, 16 May 2019 01:13 UTC

Return-Path: <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44DD120154 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dxLnLd8Kuq3B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.sbone.de (cross.sbone.de [195.201.62.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4609E12010D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F4E88D4A179; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:13:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B60A1E707C2; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:13:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de
Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1MyHXnmjfHXg; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:13:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.13.230.113] (fresh-ayiya.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:f001::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8489E707AD; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:13:04 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Alternatives to the flag (Was:Confirmation to advance: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6only-flag-05)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 01:13:02 +0000
X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6137)
Message-ID: <BD622A92-331D-4AFB-94C8-5A007F9DBDB9@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <0FDCBB0C-B5A6-48C0-AABE-91FDE49D8D63@gmail.com>
References: <F8BFFCAD-E58E-4736-8A1C-56579B6F6032@employees.org> <a2465e81-a17f-ab48-efda-20fe12a70077@foobar.org> <30239E0C-C444-4A7E-8342-AEE47BF8A2BB@employees.org> <20190505200449.GB7546@vurt.meerval.net> <80073906-c3c0-1f22-9e7f-c2b349063936@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xzVW3m0mN7jEn8SYyYCYhrufVnkfp3rBjJcijBkvucNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC-35yVYXSRR0sRL-MBMHyOFZtJx9E9h14G8qqVh5T7qGA@mail.gmail.com> <232c1a43-0fd9-4eae-737b-260a3906f72a@gmail.com> <663F6C0B-7B8A-4088-B9C0-B2867B0C3EB8@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau3VJN7qNHAW-yStMrDRCa4vsDs2ObkAxswnYbcHde2t_w@mail.gmail.com> <m1hPqHO-0000J8C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAN-Dau3R=4JbcbK7tWkJKYzVjq7DvAAEjVsbCLbZdYYO8OJ0YA@mail.gmail.com> <m1hQ7Dm-0000M3C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAN-Dau040j6U+1CCn0QJiVMy2nVShHqqSFdCkM-FbMAH-2wjRA@mail.gmail.com> <m1hQCYr-0000KBC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAN-Dau3Lcv3qTBVtig36RfbQKuGpoqdTLfrM=eWfYxCCQRy5Sw@mail.gmail.com> <m1hQfSy-0000LTC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAN-Dau3akjaZ-j16ucOY=-d0nabG4ZdFs6wrSD4EGr3NEh9Wsw@mail.gmail.com> <a646a186-be05-cdff-c8e4-61cf09930494@foobar.org> <0FDCBB0C-B5A6-48C0-AABE-91FDE49D8D63@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/y1kKYM3XcUZ5WEOxJHmH9H_bTEw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 01:13:13 -0000

On 15 May 2019, at 20:33, Gyan Mishra wrote:

> I have not tried but can printers use IPv6 link local to print
> similar to IPv4 when a dhcp server is not present?

Mine could do in 2012.  It was living on an IPv6-only network back then 
already (and so does its successor since).

The old one would also learn prefixes from RAs.  It only had a problem 
with SNMP replies and source address selection for supply level 
information when there was more than one prefix announced by different 
routers on the network (didn’t just turn the addresses around but 
replied from a random address confusing the requesting client).

/bz