[Ltru] Re: Updated draft-4646bis...

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 02 August 2007 08:20 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGVv2-0002HH-TM; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:20:28 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IGVv2-0002HC-AU for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:20:28 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGVv1-0002H3-TY for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:20:27 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGVv1-0001JZ-Hc for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:20:27 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 105E01C0100; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:20:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA861C00FE; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:20:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083B558EB9A; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:20:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:20:27 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
Message-ID: <20070802082027.GA10784@nic.fr>
References: <auto-000109950059@customermail2.easily.co.uk> <46B0AC1B.60702@yahoo-inc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46B0AC1B.60702@yahoo-inc.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: 'LTRU Working Group' <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Updated draft-4646bis...
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 08:51:55AM -0700,
 Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com> wrote 
 a message of 141 lines which said:

> How about this version instead:

Better than the one in 4646bis-07 (which uses the word "meaningless",
while I recently noticed that "meaning" is used several times in the
draft, in a different sense).

What about adding also in 2.2.9. "Classes of Conformance":

<t>A tag is considered "real" if it is valid and if there are existing
resources available which match that tag. Unlike "well-formedness" and
"validity", "reality" is a fuzzy concept, and a moving one (new
resources can appear, making a tag real, without any change in the
registry). See <xref target="meaning"/>.</t>

[Thanks to Philip José Farmer whose novel "The lovers" gave me the
idea to define "reality" :-) ]



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru