Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Tue, 26 June 2012 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1510621F85A2 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.031
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.031 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ol+VhWZKt3JD for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [76.96.32.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B86121F85A1 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.56.114]) by copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id C7WM3M1.22745999; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:21:39 -0600
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.7.88]) by PACDCEXHUB01.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::84e8:95f3:f13b:169e%13]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:38:50 -0400
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>, Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
Thread-Index: AQHNU8KLTPlGgvfoI0KmrAqx769azg==
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:38:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CC0F6B61.228E4%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <04DCBF0D-2B31-42E8-A363-22656FBAF447@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.2.120421
x-originating-ip: [24.40.55.72]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3423562729_1099208"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>, "ian.farrer@telekom.de" <ian.farrer@telekom.de>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:38:56 -0000

Dear Satoru,

Did you propose the WG to revise the charter to add this work? I am sure
the current charter does not reflect this.

Regards,
Yiu

On 6/26/12 11:54 AM, "Satoru Matsushima" <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
wrote:

>'multi-protocol socket v2.0'