Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com> Wed, 27 June 2012 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFCB21F8657 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.857
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.857 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.259, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFdK+q0HIRUq for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBB721F8622 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AHN53613; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:08:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:05:12 -0700
Received: from SZXEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.60) by dfweml408-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:05:16 -0700
Received: from SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.110]) by szxeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:05:09 +0800
From: Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
Thread-Index: AQHNVAcD7+bD+aq95Ue2+IseQtZKRpcNkH2AgAAl2YCAAIz3c4AAASMn
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:05:07 +0000
Message-ID: <B8D69818-3DF7-404A-AB5A-1C5D4260E528@mimectl>
References: <CC0F2D82.285F4%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4ireDBzacCFDYgh3kn3+MXx1=m3Kab6Wp7TFwnHeyfwDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH3bfADW1LN5nr1trd+Hu0tu4R3cHNEcx5yppN4p4Rh1bHaq1w@mail.gmail.com> <04DCBF0D-2B31-42E8-A363-22656FBAF447@gmail.com> <CAFUBMqURHk_AJfaTmx0vVJVuVFL0QaKZp15p=fZXX+Ftpf50cg@mail.gmail.com> <4FEAFAB3.5020200@gmail.com>, <4FEB1A73.2030906@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FEB1A73.2030906@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.24.1.45]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8D698183DF7404AAB5A1C5D4260E528mimectl_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:08:43 -0000

http://xkcd.com/449/ - Just for a test







________________________________
From: softwires-bounces@ietf.org [softwires-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Tomek Mrugalski [tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 22:36
To: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

On 27.06.2012 14:21, Tom Taylor wrote:
> An old cartoon I once saw, making fun of ISDN IIRC, showed a single
> socket on the outside of the wall, connected to a rat's-nest of
> connections on the inside. This seems apt for the present enterprise.
Regarding cartoons, I believe this one is relevant as well:

http://xkcd.com/927/

Cheers,
Tomek
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires