IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Mon, 25 June 2012 03:50 UTC

Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0964911E8085 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.058
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.058 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.161, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e487521sdaUC for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (pacdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [69.241.43.119]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A15D21F856F for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.56.116]) by pacdcavaout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id 97wm3m1.17059231; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:40:59 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.7.88]) by pacdcexhub03.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::5527:6d6b:29a7:f414%15]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:50:42 -0400
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
Thread-Index: AQHNUoWxkgQkpVKIO0CmMJbcZZxzaA==
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:50:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CC0D580C.226FB%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <C98BB323-9676-411B-9AC8-D930412F9AD4@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.2.120421
x-originating-ip: [24.40.55.70]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3423426640_6402548"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:50:49 -0000

Hi Satoru,

To me, this changes the stateless operation model. I respectfully disagree
your statement "Nothing changed".

Regards,
Yiu

On 6/24/12 11:47 PM, "Satoru Matsushima" <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
wrote:

>This could be same operation with any other, configure FMRs into a map
>tunnel.
>Nothing changed.
>
>cheers,
>--satoru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email