IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> Tue, 26 June 2012 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1079C21F8597 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.698, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eI4nMxSz0qrg for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC6D21F8593 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dacx6 with SMTP id x6so70438dac.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=URays45zNHrPeRtK+6EGwQI09PBNQAu93VEzdRTqCKE=; b=UcDKX/L7z6kyBKU/KYzpD9xyXdarYH61xHxMTBpxNJgU5rWlT54JD12F15tEhQjUZm LbjLmOACRzgllnXXWZLbrCTm9zAZDrHpkjRoT2bwNoc0TJOz5UBx22z0+i4zOKPx0IIU 7WHDXHViEVefnT1aJG70ueYlcBAst2LJhE0cwC3mbyR58g8jExGYqQKLUL699j+smlso UbgFFHImaC2uEAtwaETvH1UBXzmcnG1HEcUewlK/HgXYE2yaELWtSZUrpN66of5tDfyq UgFehMDTW3RzLv7HD0dlhUthtfhIkp3b2+5NbiZOKd04DfZBjsA/FkUPo5MbxYvwyvWn viVA==
Received: by 10.68.200.98 with SMTP id jr2mr53002460pbc.81.1340726044081; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2400:2411:8900::c4d3:cb9d:88a0:274b? ([2400:2411:8900:0:c4d3:cb9d:88a0:274b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nv6sm12203546pbc.42.2012.06.26.08.54.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH3bfADW1LN5nr1trd+Hu0tu4R3cHNEcx5yppN4p4Rh1bHaq1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:54:00 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <04DCBF0D-2B31-42E8-A363-22656FBAF447@gmail.com>
References: <CC0F2D82.285F4%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4ireDBzacCFDYgh3kn3+MXx1=m3Kab6Wp7TFwnHeyfwDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH3bfADW1LN5nr1trd+Hu0tu4R3cHNEcx5yppN4p4Rh1bHaq1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, ian.farrer@telekom.de
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:54:11 -0000

On 2012/06/27, at 0:11, Qiong wrote:

> Agree with Ian.
> 
> MAP is designed and optimized for algorithmatic address mapping, but not for per-subscriber rule mapping. Actually, the more you would like to solve, more complicated it will become.
> 
> I will certainly not buy MAP for per-subscriber case when MAP-T, MAP-E, map-dhcp all becomes useless or not optimized. And I will not deploy per-subscriber stateful and stateless solutions at the same. 
> 
> So I encourage two seperated approaches optimized for different scenarios. It will be good for both.
> 
> Do we really all forget about the "KISS" principle ?

Not quite.
I believe that the most motivate to start this work in the wg has destined MAP to be 'multi-protocol socket v2.0' that's what the former wg chair wished to. Do you remember that?

cheers,
--satoru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email