IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> Mon, 25 June 2012 08:52 UTC

Return-Path: <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2363521F846A for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.299, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXbcnQOq4f6f for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2357B21F846E for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so6322038pbc.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=azqPru1Kj+fTRoblgIuuFCyl/2MDrjN0Isv821G2nTU=; b=ZtND+gpmvjqF80PMcSpK5NImODcT5RiraJzKZcJKG8WGu4uzsw1apb9ADFgXJPA3Ra R1ET5UJCtMxY1R7p/B/wesbRx845iHTjR0jDTcnOKBuhEJhR2QK7yd9mCJniBdMvCg1u ggk4t4TugcYmWg2CQeDFnwSCMKdGvQS4nvcimDdSvfUGUNim4sPL1EwkZyf94w1FAqZG +r+S0k748IVDgSdldfOGWdkRUJy7u5lEcTyZUgHbVpXC9NxxFW3pIBNMsSo/S3uxGJQM JDq3y0HNnUC4yEw9iv3xxt/2eKvX/KpjIQB2frenOHxQZgaHsV8WRVDYtl+OH1gg7TyT eFMg==
Received: by 10.68.221.227 with SMTP id qh3mr37887474pbc.115.1340614372985; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.201.81.61] ([202.45.12.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ok6sm7919851pbb.29.2012.06.25.01.52.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC16W0DXE3vVpHKLh6Lf1H9WaL0T3+_TXB1gNy+EUeNb5O=P6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:52:47 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <68F1620B-02AC-4AC0-8B3F-A9FE2620BBB3@gmail.com>
References: <CAH3bfABLVeMhij1DvUAUFYDUe3kCPDi9WMwGKvMwP1e8-Pem-g@mail.gmail.com> <4F63FEA2-B20C-4772-A9D6-EF87DFAB7134@gmail.com> <CAH3bfACSAprydBsk9J4PoRbiJ2TyuSoVCYCua0YX5SWbsbGJbA@mail.gmail.com> <2BB8471B-E912-49BF-BF77-6F7FE8A6D742@gmail.com> <CAH3bfAAt0YM-5Le_Ha6U_V9e8rHM6xDZP97heqLM+vgrfQbxtw@mail.gmail.com> <07698BA1-CBEE-45E3-9CE2-B0ED530EFE93@gmail.com> <CAC16W0DXE3vVpHKLh6Lf1H9WaL0T3+_TXB1gNy+EUeNb5O=P6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:52:57 -0000

Hi Peng,

On 2012/06/25, at 17:37, Peng Wu wrote:

>> Please find it out on page 14 from following url:
>> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/slides/softwire-2.pdf
> 
> I think that's not what Alain meant. If you look back and forth a bit,
> you can see that:
> B1 stands for per-subscriber stateufl/mapping/binding...
> B2 stand for stateless Hub & Spoke (in MAP case, FMRs not provisoned to CE)
> B3 stand for stateless Mesh (in MAP case, FMRs provisoned to CE)
> The confusion comes from the use of per-­subscriber in the slides.
> It's not the sementic we took in this thread.

What's the differences from the semantics in this thread?
Since per-subscriber mapping operation should naturally be a hub-and-spoke means, it is just a case of stateless solution operation.

cheers,
--satoru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email