IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> Wed, 27 June 2012 10:27 UTC

Return-Path: <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FEB21F866B for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 03:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g+yHYmsEb6rl for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 03:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEFB21F84EA for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 03:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dacx6 with SMTP id x6so1227390dac.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 03:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=ATxueJQAW0BMdy3EzcwB7UPGI/6FAYKaKH8jUPEB9zs=; b=PIa6qrtQG/3XSe/g2INQCkkG+ZEsMfGwN4F2GsYTOAce93xCfdWNBHZp5wv6nNyo0+ MZt+5mv4qeshiCiFbt9/yaT5nX2FMnQL4IP2Xv24/VNJ95uwUCXloksPebfiw5LS5CTY qdPSwpYcHll0kCjgYiEKKGaz1wq6w4hCq05y1f7wx8yAs77NVO9T2rwvUW00LzGhC/yx 96EaYziI94epfTG4gKYJMmnzjkw42E75Bc6CTf7Ba+YJUnxeJMt59Q+Wle51qthCuVhM In/P3vg8rxlzxvuE20N4nqboVPKW0557RkdjdCWKY+d8f+Z2xcxbl5gRfufDc5+0VEVS EoTQ==
Received: by 10.68.223.198 with SMTP id qw6mr42716925pbc.94.1340792853230; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 03:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.201.81.61] ([202.45.12.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nv6sm14779336pbc.42.2012.06.27.03.27.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 03:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAtO+Xn0MTArNZtv7Y8bQOG-KZh6ukixY4mMQmR=KCx+b51Jqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:27:28 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DC97C072-F1B4-4244-9492-75CC8EEB930F@gmail.com>
References: <CC0F2D82.285F4%ian.farrer@telekom.de> <CAFFjW4ireDBzacCFDYgh3kn3+MXx1=m3Kab6Wp7TFwnHeyfwDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH3bfADW1LN5nr1trd+Hu0tu4R3cHNEcx5yppN4p4Rh1bHaq1w@mail.gmail.com> <04DCBF0D-2B31-42E8-A363-22656FBAF447@gmail.com> <CAFUBMqURHk_AJfaTmx0vVJVuVFL0QaKZp15p=fZXX+Ftpf50cg@mail.gmail.com> <C41CE132-8C42-4898-B2DF-43BBFAE89515@gmail.com> <CAC16W0Ds-aRLMbyVdwifA3wjJwHuKOKjhkDLxxRm+X68wOnv7A@mail.gmail.com> <CBD94C41-5A67-4DDC-BDE4-514C7F186E8B@gmail.com> <CAC16W0CUWhwLD8NFGxsCHWGUtRatpSUvOfFAerriUbtuQLezcA@mail.gmail.com> <1E6988FF-BFE6-4DA4-A7F6-B8BC4205967F@gmail.com> <CAAtO+XmHYvSOwxOShiNfEgXhOMGvKhPce2vvTWXa=+i+47GeSg@mail.gmail.com> <B725FD4A-35D6-46BE-A32A-87C3E4C3F958@gmail.com> <CAAtO+Xn-HJNh=h8299MhNAKNGwZDzVzTwy29+FKujHt6wp=pwA@mail.gmail.com> <C6D684E4-16B4-4B6D-8B72-4A5F8615EBA3@gmail.com> <CAAtO+Xn0MTArNZtv7Y8bQOG-KZh6ukixY4mMQmR=KCx+b51Jqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:27:38 -0000

Qi,

On 2012/06/27, at 19:01, Qi Sun wrote:

> 
> [Qi] DHCPv4 over IPv6 is a provisioning method. And it's about the public IPv4 address allocation, NOT about IPv4 address and IPv6 address mapping. So there is no state. Please read the draft of DHCPv4 over IPv6 for clarification.
> LW4over6 needs to maintain the binding table on TC. That's stateful.

That sense is 'stateless' in my mind if there's no DHCP state in the BR. 

> Actually in MAP 1:1 mode there will be a binding table right? Here comes the question: what will you do if there are new comers or some users leaving the network?

it is just an operation in provision. Now I find that LW46 could be possible to merged with MAP, or vice versa. thanks.

cheers,
--satoru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email