Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> Mon, 25 June 2012 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD8E21F84B3 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.375
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EEMApffLEnOZ for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B0E21F8466 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so6365947pbc.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=79UW1vj6sZuo30e0wFhj7QkeiqpaiuTusgVLYaZcNl0=; b=hGEVIXbM24dsKHuB1j60JJjd8yYrHQcVim5RZ8W3Tom4QvhGb1+JZR0T8paG7lYYqP Bhp1l810VLGUDOYUvIJ++YgFtjxX3/4EQBELIsHthuPRA9Jz2otFqzBqzby4urW92Mw4 7wxh5kewyfmaRNOkbECNfprAn+YKlICI6fOi9nkk2S4hc7CfII20vJ37GdNMs98nvKz2 9vjl/NMghwlP+gvx1Xy+Bv2dcOGeBrs59DUY2Qt3K9NmGVZXCx0kvr3lKKrG42gPXsPe BtrGdoJNtfxGaezp4DP/hcdbEfm2U0jTRFT2ecCT/28bJbUQ/dtfJFghPBREK8nJs009 p4VQ==
Received: by 10.68.132.166 with SMTP id ov6mr39531937pbb.24.1340616490337; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.201.81.61] ([202.45.12.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id na10sm8001101pbc.23.2012.06.25.02.28.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC16W0As9=nM2ZCFvW34rtS5q6277u7hoJHLwN6xge6zKJy=1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:27:55 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <3CB66B2A-3462-4415-88D3-4435238AF9F7@gmail.com>
References: <CAH3bfABLVeMhij1DvUAUFYDUe3kCPDi9WMwGKvMwP1e8-Pem-g@mail.gmail.com> <4F63FEA2-B20C-4772-A9D6-EF87DFAB7134@gmail.com> <CAH3bfACSAprydBsk9J4PoRbiJ2TyuSoVCYCua0YX5SWbsbGJbA@mail.gmail.com> <2BB8471B-E912-49BF-BF77-6F7FE8A6D742@gmail.com> <CAH3bfAAt0YM-5Le_Ha6U_V9e8rHM6xDZP97heqLM+vgrfQbxtw@mail.gmail.com> <07698BA1-CBEE-45E3-9CE2-B0ED530EFE93@gmail.com> <CAC16W0DXE3vVpHKLh6Lf1H9WaL0T3+_TXB1gNy+EUeNb5O=P6A@mail.gmail.com> <68F1620B-02AC-4AC0-8B3F-A9FE2620BBB3@gmail.com> <CAC16W0DbUotLpkGZ+5dFx4iiE+0wP4RQAm07_aDdZv3DEOMwxg@mail.gmail.com> <D9BA4DB1-2849-42D4-829F-F56C14593E03@gmail.com> <CAC16W0As9=nM2ZCFvW34rtS5q6277u7hoJHLwN6xge6zKJy=1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:28:11 -0000

On 2012/06/25, at 18:22, Peng Wu wrote:

> This is ... ...
> 
> Just take a look at the title of slide 15: so you are for the
> statement of "MAP is a solution of per subscriber mappings on CPE"?
> 

???
--satoru