IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com> Mon, 25 June 2012 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C724721F8480 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kcQb76U-oNmI for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f170.google.com (mail-qc0-f170.google.com [209.85.216.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3056B21F848A for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcmt36 with SMTP id t36so2084949qcm.15 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Q37B4cs9Z4ySXz9OK/9GaYfDNF9qjDB0v5hHDUobdE=; b=hJra6hdVv09KQ83sDx6Brdvmu7OtlYQBxqQrByT/13YGyDSGxgXnk5ZZvRSSA9f2fz vloF+INo1tS4r7onWLdS9lACdZMJHlYFCeRWmhKD+H6Cmvxvx6tvgcQM9lDp6gztrEDy +eQpN1GI9PTMfuYKqEqTxmI9cw+3Wa9APkTNsDeVSxaQZHO/r1oBjdw7jqyYNzJtcbII KfGZvvoQIp2zIV3y+RW64mAjq8sBpdhNx2kIrbOjS/qJ2v3W1jW/tnZqyUL3dSL9VgSG EDvDnk+p8GWcIRpZWdkXS23CJLJbKeqBd80T1/N1NGsys4kmudtqvXzZUlvBMWcWKvgB YYRA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.135.140 with SMTP id n12mr3674344qct.139.1340613472469; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.216.212 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <07698BA1-CBEE-45E3-9CE2-B0ED530EFE93@gmail.com>
References: <CAH3bfABLVeMhij1DvUAUFYDUe3kCPDi9WMwGKvMwP1e8-Pem-g@mail.gmail.com> <4F63FEA2-B20C-4772-A9D6-EF87DFAB7134@gmail.com> <CAH3bfACSAprydBsk9J4PoRbiJ2TyuSoVCYCua0YX5SWbsbGJbA@mail.gmail.com> <2BB8471B-E912-49BF-BF77-6F7FE8A6D742@gmail.com> <CAH3bfAAt0YM-5Le_Ha6U_V9e8rHM6xDZP97heqLM+vgrfQbxtw@mail.gmail.com> <07698BA1-CBEE-45E3-9CE2-B0ED530EFE93@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:37:52 +0800
Message-ID: <CAC16W0DXE3vVpHKLh6Lf1H9WaL0T3+_TXB1gNy+EUeNb5O=P6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:37:57 -0000

Hi Satoru,

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Satoru Matsushima
<satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Qiong,
>
> On 2012/06/25, at 15:06, Qiong wrote:
>
>> Hi Satoru,
>>
>> Would you please point out in which presentation in the Beijing Interim meeting illustrated "per-subscriber mapping" as one characteristic of MAP solution? I recall which xiaohong presented was a stateful one.
>
> Please find it out on page 14 from following url:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/slides/softwire-2.pdf

I think that's not what Alain meant. If you look back and forth a bit,
you can see that:
B1 stands for per-subscriber stateufl/mapping/binding...
B2 stand for stateless Hub & Spoke (in MAP case, FMRs not provisoned to CE)
B3 stand for stateless Mesh (in MAP case, FMRs provisoned to CE)
The confusion comes from the use of per-­subscriber in the slides.
It's not the sementic we took in this thread.

>
> cheers,
> --satoru
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email