Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG

Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com> Mon, 25 June 2012 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C9221F84B2 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.544
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFgLjWcgQ+TE for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638D121F8472 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcqp1 with SMTP id p1so2091352vcq.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZkmKhjxTjzpSmm9BAdITiPCaec4Jebq82CvlChIA4HM=; b=r3ayGSwGE1fHEJBj/95aWsfXWdhQDKP5CvnyAkcllLwhzzeFRzYGqM8uvonD7fff7K hJKBoLcg663o7ipEENtyEcxIJkpu7s1HUz58/s/kxm0wG/Okv3X9xWT0h8dW2fOuPYrC gdEjwpUN1xMMqMOTwaik+SJKiwc+BVg0Uce3mq7KkAPtzzv2DQ8TrAwJYlEBf6RSsxEo aYzbyt/qjswDVf2XmHDck7xdK59x7zLojrzeNylw4BdqfO9YpjsVnG+JxC637Qesipwj Ks/WE1EVaL9HuGXkGv3JjsflRerVfWTszsfk7wcdAIyMRMoiBNmX3QJvxrBYBAPF0ta0 bABg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.90.233 with SMTP id bz9mr6021117vdb.93.1340616171799; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.28.84 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D9BA4DB1-2849-42D4-829F-F56C14593E03@gmail.com>
References: <CAH3bfABLVeMhij1DvUAUFYDUe3kCPDi9WMwGKvMwP1e8-Pem-g@mail.gmail.com> <4F63FEA2-B20C-4772-A9D6-EF87DFAB7134@gmail.com> <CAH3bfACSAprydBsk9J4PoRbiJ2TyuSoVCYCua0YX5SWbsbGJbA@mail.gmail.com> <2BB8471B-E912-49BF-BF77-6F7FE8A6D742@gmail.com> <CAH3bfAAt0YM-5Le_Ha6U_V9e8rHM6xDZP97heqLM+vgrfQbxtw@mail.gmail.com> <07698BA1-CBEE-45E3-9CE2-B0ED530EFE93@gmail.com> <CAC16W0DXE3vVpHKLh6Lf1H9WaL0T3+_TXB1gNy+EUeNb5O=P6A@mail.gmail.com> <68F1620B-02AC-4AC0-8B3F-A9FE2620BBB3@gmail.com> <CAC16W0DbUotLpkGZ+5dFx4iiE+0wP4RQAm07_aDdZv3DEOMwxg@mail.gmail.com> <D9BA4DB1-2849-42D4-829F-F56C14593E03@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:22:51 +0800
Message-ID: <CAC16W0As9=nM2ZCFvW34rtS5q6277u7hoJHLwN6xge6zKJy=1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peng Wu <pengwu.thu@gmail.com>
To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:22:53 -0000

This is ... ...

Just take a look at the title of slide 15: so you are for the
statement of "MAP is a solution of per subscriber mappings on CPE"?

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Satoru Matsushima
<satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> wrote:tak
> Hi Peng,
>
> On 2012/06/25, at 18:08, Peng Wu wrote:
>
>> The discussion in this thread falls in the case of B1. Not the slide
>> you refered to (slide 14) at all.
>
> Not true. I discuss this thread in the context of B2.
> Please read the slides, again.
>
> cheers,
> --satoru