IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 20 July 2017 08:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05699126557 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JLii39_g3slV for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CFE4127337 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id c74so9028492iod.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bzIcSr7GXGtOwtK1M8rzG/qO/gNQgKRZZC+PGt5FwHw=; b=KVOjIOyL4bhKLQ4493+fYMtd2hduZeBaM7PI9348DkwTm+MnU26j6n/FRpYDFhtgxx DtzHOTWu//JwJNiWrgrUIaSnEZdxHnggCblSs94PBuOgOTlx+0oLsmZ+xk//nzVIT21T WZ84A8UgYMOd9/WGdw95zcc0MGCm6c3tengMwlyPx7BniZGQa2ctbzWmsCiri1binN2g +SvWr2aAczL6vB/8kNPounMYWaeRazuBuo4EGjhsn7K+wwE4gHzO62Dbjzt+yLA4Po+r gnsFDdS/fNPxIUqixBKWsCdYknJxsJIgEaRRzz7L/hB/hipyHlz2HMDlPjjetHq0L77s 3kdA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bzIcSr7GXGtOwtK1M8rzG/qO/gNQgKRZZC+PGt5FwHw=; b=EV1jEGtUBVvySZAQe8YQ5UThKjhKdH/v9NoNqR4l/5bksDkLvuqIPWFsZGO23R/UMD S9qj1QrTQXz87ftD4kumDDhISIvBZvijRh15gDThjeqLZZhFBL5LrSvtpMfNHMRjAl3x XpUK9CqZiyMF6/Dkzu1DyXRbyt61mKLAv5Lbr82pSaa1oXqUoggHJz9RNgq32fT9IR90 6BC9TiOQn4XPgnI+hnyHhFQHBJKB6yCqtZ1IHMNJzsZtinal3z/d5YgVcDvY8AgJVpoa igjUeGNhCLGFyJxDOqapl1S8QBqFxrSmXFK4s9gEKqjNrUxc6sGbltPWiNzPkWxbhNZj a1jQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113+lrEP2QdYl64IUOO8oSHXClfNXqQoZ7rAm5yEVKcs5hFXdR6S aQkuhxiJ9BEPF03wpHFc6wJP4bJo+YDJ
X-Received: by 10.107.59.84 with SMTP id i81mr2728798ioa.72.1500538884769; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.195.137 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170720062751.GL45648@Space.Net>
References: <596CF817.8040900@foobar.org> <BC0BBAF5-B016-44B5-8D73-BC9382CB79A9@google.com> <20170719090835.GC45648@Space.Net> <CAKD1Yr29MmGJuX+uhXaroB6UMRBBWBscCZPaMjaVscL0q7a7pg@mail.gmail.com> <98208c2e-7524-7afa-b0c8-865f251cd66e@gmail.com> <20170720062751.GL45648@Space.Net>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:21:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1ihnqHAzjhPcA8HB7sBBRwht2t5epJqQA-B_YGnfoTQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c06537e33248d0554bb6fd2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/6lqAl53gCYRqxF8EC9mqLHfEcX8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:21:27 -0000

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

> (And do not tell me that people would do DHCPv6 IA_NA/IA_TA *and* SLAAC
> on the same network - technically you could, but nobody would do that,
> given that it voids the reason *why* IA_NA/IA_TA are used: control, DNS,
> etc - note I'm not saying "security")


That's not true at all. There are (tens of) millions of home networks that
do both IA_NA and SLAAC.

SLAAC addresses provide ample address space and have robust privacy
properties, and IA_NA addresses are can be useful for things like home
servers that need stable addresses and dynamic DNS entries, such as home
servers.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email