IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543D0131C52 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6xzlZ4t3Bz33 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31FA1131C51 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 5so26658611iow.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MEdBv7yo/Q7ATM7E2F8F3gHXJsUMVloQMCjke42Zk2s=; b=GIS2mJnM0w4ojQesOCc2EsTK2ns0nQNZ1rNbYQpojTOQRbJzM66gokYMB1XxfJCNNO TtzX6pHM8nKGuaQn0ikP3FgVhz8WU/6o20H1kiX2o3RoWoluFh332hnIyA2a/DLEQmhH 1Ju49Jvt3Fq++Hecssb3b7IIPN1TuIxJHj+HDqPeZGHMKzCxX6Ondx5qLK6BJDwh1xuo nK0GPyZ8PTfsqCetVG7TwWAzlpZKxGRHxhAVmRWdP5vuX2zej2k2IzD7TXh9hpgOuUOX ojJqOZSHrFDnhu+OaMFvbeTQA+3OWr/z6g+ZFKY6iYPxsfcFHa/aCsvCyd5mU0qBZW+r PhqA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MEdBv7yo/Q7ATM7E2F8F3gHXJsUMVloQMCjke42Zk2s=; b=IBPVi0M3scIXAVtSS3bwMozh5YXk62NO+Bw154objrBdqqPUkHVLqgeNrspAL6UQlr oz9spP3ovIEPgrRw2LzGN8WlQ8E60u2PvuEJP41tHpY6Rqbhb08YIO4/CLk8lBkLjX6e yZZ3xiV9xlS7A4P1hoU3xbNuHvMcV0L0I4Vo7FKHKKbdPs9t7ND1mmxl6XlNY41d9KCE pSpY4D2pVovvtwsCugFjGk213uzKZgi8v0qyqu3RN2scr2hDibG4kLIMwPvyD60PH6Q6 W2JgiJqBwbd7h8QFKfkiczK6uRnp2lhzIYI4rdEcFM7wxF/uRRBYlVyPi69Q+q2H0mwr MHbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111amBUNzdOpW88hqSE99kHaM9/mdLj8eAjYgjxGrab/xDyludV0 Ua/hWYsX0/pTgl+AKwkmSBrIvVG7NHP8
X-Received: by 10.107.168.164 with SMTP id e36mr1352178ioj.40.1500455814096; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.130.164 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170719090835.GC45648@Space.Net>
References: <596CF817.8040900@foobar.org> <BC0BBAF5-B016-44B5-8D73-BC9382CB79A9@google.com> <20170719090835.GC45648@Space.Net>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:16:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr29MmGJuX+uhXaroB6UMRBBWBscCZPaMjaVscL0q7a7pg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11426e7ccd94be0554a81721"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/DB-zsr-zSvnVCfw40WRrBO8gtEc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:16:56 -0000

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:44:29AM -0700, james woodyatt wrote:
> > That would be a gross misinterpretation of the recommendation.
> > The recommendation in RFC 7934 is clearly written and does not need
> > updating to provide more clarity about the implications for usage
> > of DHCPv6. The clear implication of the recommendation is *NOT*
> > that networks SHOULD NOT provide DHCPv6 services. The clear implication
> > of the recommendation is that networks SHOULD NOT require hosts to
> > use DHCPv6 with IA_NA/IA_TA to obtain all their addresses.
>
> And this is not a "recommendation that networks SHOULD NOT provide DHCPv6
> stateful addressing services"?
>

There is no recommendation that networks SHOULD NOT provide stateful DHCPv6
addressing services.

There is a recommendation that networks SHOULD NOT provide *only* stateful
DHCPv6 addressing services (where "addressing services" currently means
IA_NA / IA_TA, but more in general, means any addressing service that
requires an explicit request to the network in order to obtain an address).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email