IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 18 July 2017 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894D9131DA6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GFvcCSZDMMgu for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49592131DA5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id q85so7509012pfq.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SPVaS9UKPTBYCSA4AQ/7h6x1U1J2nGTHZOpWjYibFUk=; b=fg/mQfZ5/12iEw2ZSp/BBKIBT5js+fGR1Pl+sTLV6Ky1IM6bR+Y2AvwBLGdOxzsl/K GRUw4WSv4zNVwgRNUb9zBtH7fPm/WRLvPwtVfAKnADmigKNW0pSJ9MejfcqP+L6tI5aR 1dE9WT4x01BLAnto6kVwjM5vPfe/yGvE/q2Fe+WfQSLiyYA8i0D+LQbY+iYJjlbXT3P+ 2FPkoIxDMDf55V855hbigT9Ag3csvv0IKXrpOq5wjpYFbQiVZoW1K3xuh+5D6I6I3yKO 0mWH7SB+B2X34PUJqOMLjPX7UtultYsjrqnIQ5JUy8tEBID3tW5e5SquCzPcV0fWi6fE fYEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SPVaS9UKPTBYCSA4AQ/7h6x1U1J2nGTHZOpWjYibFUk=; b=W35zphZufJtTLaEp61kHVWoMf5chlrYBBFGZHlHDYWm4UDLXJJO2/OxKyoGiuETXLH MCaHxjOGCZAlrq8R0QgOXZzCxgQ5j+nTYgWUyaIOPJv0F3qWf0Zk1pZTp/i4G2OL9SNM jtrg/Cppt3R9WM+g7mQsPznOHizAgo9Gic9ut2vRQKfSe+z5KMTu1uHcyURJOjVKGbTB W08p3Ppb3U//yIffWPQHSJzI7vt7KymcbrU31iQtN2je3n6wGLe2kBd7VtIWAgi419hB ukLOuZCEGWVHBfCZIjYMJC9A4cZR0I+moYwazpII8DRQ0bs7XkYeqweyIZ86JFEHlTau p/XQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110Z73dZMqZFefBYHcwNjQaLVI/aY3pN5JHBoOGiLf0ENCNdfTTt 47/yllES3eIRRs+iLsV5hwPuDdrXtCUm
X-Received: by 10.84.231.16 with SMTP id f16mr310801plk.131.1500363930773; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.181.42 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2wFSXWru_Tgwpuf2xgOCr2iX0BwrTHvnS2TcR6EQBi1Fw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <596CF817.8040900@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2wFSXWru_Tgwpuf2xgOCr2iX0BwrTHvnS2TcR6EQBi1Fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:44:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mO+kHtVd++bxzhBFMiC6bWhrbREq=M_Qck0Mp=-VHSFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4030436018220c02b055492b38a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Gl9BEIOpABBpSOsWPyi9PzyFvbo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:45:33 -0000

Yeah, a couple of reminders here.  First, the text in the RFC is explicitly
recommending the use of IA_PD as the _only_ solution to delegating
prefixes.   Second, this is an RFC, and the document that proposes a way to
delegate prefixes without DHCP is a draft, not an RFC.   That document is
not mentioned in the RFC.   So to suggest that this document says that IETF
consensus is that DHCP is NOT RECOMMENDED is simply incorrect.​

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email