IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...

mathew <meta@pobox.com> Sat, 07 June 2003 22:18 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA24341 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:18:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h57MICI32290 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:18:12 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h57MIBB32287 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:18:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA24319; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:18:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Olyr-0006HG-00; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 18:16:09 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Olyr-0006H9-00; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 18:16:09 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h57MGBB32220; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:16:11 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h57MFTB32196 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:15:29 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA24237 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 18:15:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19OlwE-0006GW-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 18:13:26 -0400
Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com ([204.127.202.62]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19OlwE-0006GF-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 18:13:26 -0400
Received: from pobox.com (h005018086b3b.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.31.45.164]) by attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with SMTP id <2003060722145300200dm8mse>; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:14:53 +0000
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
From: mathew <meta@pobox.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <16094.44384.458521.584391@world.std.com>
Message-Id: <77412420-9935-11D7-A840-000393CAA6AA@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 18:14:54 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wednesday, Jun 4, 2003, at 22:39 US/Eastern, Barry Shein wrote:
> This is why, without per-message fees, this system is doomed. It's
> just a matter of time.

I agree with this too. Of all the options discussed, the only one I see 
having any chance whatsoever of working is per-message fees, with some 
method to exempt friends.

Right now we have the situation that usage of resources is 
unconstrained by cost to the person using them. Can anyone think of a 
system like that which hasn't collapsed under the weight of abuse?


mathew

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status