Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin

[Scott Kitterman <[e-mail]>]

On Sunday, June 30, 2013 01:07:58 PM Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 6/30/2013 1:04 PM, John Levine wrote:
> > I'm with Scott.  While I agree that it would be bad to make
> > incompatible changes to the many bits on the wire, the document itself
> > could be improved.
> 
> Indeed, purely editorial, non-technical work rarely (if ever) warrants a
> working group.
> 
> And there have recently been some detail, independent reviews that are
> prompted a document revision that will be issued within days.

So then we're discussing about a BoF that may or may not include discussion of 
a document that we haven't actually seen yet because it's being developed in 
private.  

1.  Definitely premature to be discussing it.

2.  I don't think the IETF should be in the rubber stamp business.

Scott K