Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

>
> Then why have a BoF at all?  It seems rather premature to discuss work
> beyond
> the base specification before we know what will be in the base
> specification.
>
> Scott K


First, the DMARC spec is sufficiently well baked and mature that it should
provide a solid enough basis for discussion.  It's not likely that changes
to it would be so drastic as to invalidate the BoF results.

Second, the *plan* right now is to have the base spec AD sponsored, but the
BoF could provide input to that plan.  We expect to hear what the community
thinks of the work and how it should proceed, as well as to get a sense of
who will work on it, who will implement it, and that sort of thing.

Barry


> Barry tells me that the base DMARC specification will be AD sponsored.
> > Therefore, the BOF will talk about work beyond the base DMARC
> > specification.
> >
> > Russ