Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin

["John Levine" <[e-mail]>]

>that we modify the proposed agenda as follows:
>-- Summary of DMARC
>-- Summary of open issues
>-- Charter review
>-- Hums
>
>Comments? Thoughts?

This version presumes that people attending the BOF need to read the
drafts first, which seems utterly reasonable.

For the charter, I think it's important for people to understand that
DMARC is basically done with multiple working implementations
including several at giant mail systems. (I've written one of the
smaller ones.)  So the WG can certainly clean up and clarify the text,
and improve the discussion of where it's useful, but it's too late
to make incompatible changes to the bits on the wire.  

We've also had people who want it to be the magic spam bullet, aka
FUSSP, and demand horrible hacks to fix what they perceive as holes in
the spec, e.g., the alleged mailing list problem.  Those sorts of
changes need to be totally off the table.

Other than that, no prob.

R's,
John