Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin

"J. Trent Adams" <jtrentadams@gmail.com> Fri, 28 June 2013 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jtrentadams@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7566B21F9C42 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AhL7uMQDrZCB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB19521F9C0E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id a13so4921177iee.20 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kxPCLy0OfAfKreE97xd4Pu6bG51BZf3GTS2DS+Z8ti4=; b=PEvTXIpuhhs+tpZlGuFQJaT4vYFetrZgd4TfFSyVIsXsXb01seAePpRfj6FnzZ4223 XhirMnwM9tYOh228rUd5rPtqS7uOz8WVeFanyU2+Jn8EzdrEu2jy12PaAOL4aiPgwoML bdR3S/fX+9ZDasYC2GoDbsieVsw6R2SPYqtts4q3pmoeovqoRBIBV8nlfTkMWHw+uPKS uKkl+dD1FiLGJypJydckkQdGqtSu5LoDsGKDyF9SH0DUsir1hk+9ZOiyKL+drQgU+RNY sj9qwa0trHzvNsNeyeGlOdaI36Ba7HN4ATDcj0/lVfuLYCyRGuxBY+AecoXP2YutCP20 hEzg==
X-Received: by 10.50.16.8 with SMTP id b8mr4854095igd.1.1372450862056; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jtrentadams-isoc.local (c-76-25-71-111.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [76.25.71.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e9sm90196igl.9.2013.06.28.13.21.01 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51CDF02C.9050303@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:21:00 -0600
From: "J. Trent Adams" <jtrentadams@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <CALaySJ+s610bC2epuKXvM-r3XLfwH7xTQAJqjEJHwm3Jy0b6Og@mail.gmail.com> <377AA4D7-3202-42B9-B6D6-05510F08990D@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <377AA4D7-3202-42B9-B6D6-05510F08990D@vigilsec.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:21:05 -0000

On 6/28/13 12:43 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
>> As some of you may have seen from the preliminary agenda, the App Area
>> will have one BoF in Berlin: Domain-based Message Authentication,
>> Reporting & Conformance (DMARC).  See the BoF wiki for details:
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki
>>
>> The BoF is currently scheduled for Tuesday afternoon, 30 July, from
>> 15:20 to 16:50 Berlin time... though that could change as the IETF
>> meeting agenda is finalized.
>>
>> Russ Housley (CC) has agreed to chair the BoF.  Russ is experienced
>> with what's needed to have a successful BoF, and will make sure we
>> stay on the right track to answer the questions we need to answer in
>> order to move forward with a working group, if that's the outcome of
>> the BoF.  He'll be working with the BoF proponents on the BoF agenda
>> over the next weeks.
>>
>> Barry, Applications AD
> Thanks Barry.  I very much want the IETF to take on this work.  Fo those people that are new to this topic, by way of introduction, I was the Security AD that sponsored the DKIM BOFs and WG.
>
> The agenda for IETF 87 is very full, and every session must be run efficiently.  I propose that we modify the proposed agenda as follows:
> -- Summary of DMARC
> -- Summary of open issues
> -- Charter review
> -- Hums
>
>
> Comments? Thoughts?

Many thanks for your support and encouragement, we're looking forward to
a productive bof in Berlin.

In that light, I think that your suggested streamlining makes sense. 
The item for the "Using DMARC" draft is a reasonable item to consider
setting aside for the proposed WG itself.

- Trent

>
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

-- 
J. Trent Adams

Profile: http://www.mediaslate.org/jtrentadams/
LinkedIN: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jtrentadams
Twitter: http://twitter.com/jtrentadams