Re: [dmarc-ietf] Charter improvements

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 7/2/2013 11:51 AM, John Levine wrote:
>>>> Replace the second and third paragraphs with:
>>>>
>>>>    The working group will adopt draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base as an input
>>>
>>> What is the work to be done on the base document?
>
> One final thought and then I'll stop: If you think that there is some
> chance of making progress on the first four charter items, it seems
> likely that the results of that progress would go into the base
> document.
>
> I suppose an alternative would be to send the base document through
> separately, then after it's published charter dmarcbis that would
> start with the RFC as an input, a highly compressed version of what
> spfbis is doing, but that seems like a lot of extra work for no
> benefit.


Your presumption is that it's necessary to make changes to the base 
document for these enhancements.  Mine is that it isn't.

So we don't need to wait.  We can proceed with the listed tasks now. If 
we find that we really do need to wait... we can.

Your approach imposes potentially unnecessary delay.  Mine doesn't.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net