IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Sun, 30 June 2013 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FEB21F8F4F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LOO4pgMszVJg for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com (mail-pa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C97921F84DC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id kq13so4216839pab.25 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q69WUEk+kPSBqxa4Po1Uyqquga4K3nzLI/KNJYjL8LQ=; b=CrXy1TWzfPWJVrk2akVpTNIdSXUwgsyvGWfMozVXAnHFTu10l7LKofXwowQJKduUND aRqZh02TOf9VTmc24UvR5f0tJvQBXrmXQCS4O+EGJfsgpKdg0xncY/tk1lVA9i/IdnEa NZ/LuIEXizS9fRRp3ErGEeEr0NJYmerroGmAJQT1S4fM5TsCPKSOsn1u1Me2Hca33So8 w6nEITlaxfJTX9JDmLXwUbuhugb34Sak5mKjG2MZg/oKoE2h6XK/jo0OXqO2tQLERpMI Fzu2MSsdCcHtfnv79oStMtkATrWbXvgoF4c3SxU3XIGS7rjo1sr/JZ3J+HhF/hxmAKR/ LlgQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.218.100 with SMTP id pf4mr20782193pbc.72.1372622892136; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.5.198] (ip-64-134-225-35.public.wayport.net. [64.134.225.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sb3sm19988273pac.14.2013.06.30.13.08.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51D0901E.4000003@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:07:58 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20130630200414.70742.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20130630200414.70742.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:08:24 -0000

On 6/30/2013 1:04 PM, John Levine wrote:
> I'm with Scott.  While I agree that it would be bad to make
> incompatible changes to the many bits on the wire, the document itself
> could be improved.


Indeed, purely editorial, non-technical work rarely (if ever) warrants a 
working group.

And there have recently been some detail, independent reviews that are 
prompted a document revision that will be issued within days.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email