IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Charter improvements

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sat, 13 July 2013 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C64E21F9E80 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lP3vAvP4A8VW for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB5921F9E4E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6DLdbtY016971; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1373751582; bh=TRtaKVeNZSKltoC09YY9IQjhw6x6rXVz/abANgDlBOg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=wz0XXXaKdVOM1YX05fKjZqXjmWRpgaqrxzoMGHCtdxJTtV/dNtOd0kzQQh0nWTEb0 68CM88wX6qEFJx6i4DUpoe5b265zS/PQo47O1WvllYh44xYsusXsqgoijh8w08xe+c RIgnDMYcDdodzsDCsnlXUyDZ5zmP+bmIYBpHCdTA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1373751582; i=@resistor.net; bh=TRtaKVeNZSKltoC09YY9IQjhw6x6rXVz/abANgDlBOg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=J5T5MXGPZM4xZbjzsnQ2ynqH7Wde4Kp3In9OSAaxPGExfaLq+ONRjo4FcgbQI1UJG KnrAWIFWbnBOcU4k+EjDvBd9FEgV59Di1FO4rI+ktxwiwnrRZAXRbZMGN/J84Luik3 92oQ/S4P+SAflV0AGuUB3c8QdgXymZtVEr9mj+FQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130713141237.0d1ff1c0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 14:32:47 -0700
To: dmarc@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130702052746.15876.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <CAL0qLwYA0B-j2J36C+7Efjkj=mzZuDGWeTqV24sjKEe7c4ACmA@mail.gmail.com> <20130702052746.15876.qmail@joyce.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Charter improvements
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 21:39:44 -0000

At 22:27 01-07-2013, John Levine wrote:
>Delete the 13th paragraph.  Delete discussions of mailing lists which are
>a hopeless black hole.  Adjust the schedule to taste.

I don't have a strong opinion about whether the future working group 
should or should not work on a draft about mailing lists.  A small 
number of people who have participated in IETF discussions about 
mailing lists are aware that it is a hopeless case.  Who knows, maybe 
this group will succeed where everyone else failed.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email