Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 6/28/2013 2:16 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> that we modify the proposed agenda as follows:
>> -- Summary of DMARC
>> -- Summary of open issues
>> -- Charter review
>> -- Hums
>>
>> Comments? Thoughts?


> This version presumes that people attending the BOF need to read the
> drafts first, which seems utterly reasonable.
>
> For the charter, I think it's important for people to understand that
> DMARC is basically done with multiple working implementations
> including several at giant mail systems. (I've written one of the
> smaller ones.)  So the WG can certainly clean up and clarify the text,
> and improve the discussion of where it's useful, but it's too late
> to make incompatible changes to the bits on the wire.

This presumes that the DMARC base specification is part of the working 
group effort.  There's been enough back and forth on this point that 
it's probably worth clarifying it for this list.

To counter the suggestion not to discuss the current "Using" draft: 
Normally a BOF will provide some commentary about documents intended as 
input to the proposed working group.


d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net