Re: [dmarc-ietf] Charter improvements

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 7/18/2013 11:25 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> 1. For the BoF, let's work on using the time productively, starting
> with the assumption that something fairly close to the currently
> published DMARC spec is where we jump off from.

Let me press the distinction between 'editorial' document changes, 
versus changes to the bits over the wire.  With that distinction in 
mind, I believe that the BOF can start with the assumption that there 
will be no changes to bits over the wire.

This is always subject to change, but there's now an extended history of 
it's being true.

So the 'fairly close' is the editorial content of the latest draft.


> 2. For the DMARC spec, let's please have more of the IETF community
> review the document, specifically responding to the questions of (a)
> what technical changes are needed in it, and (b) whether it should be
> published as a Standards Track specification.

We have a review sequence lined up.  We suspended it after the first two 
because the call for editorial changes was strong enough and for enough 
change to make it worth letting further reviewers benefit from what we 
believe will be significantly improved readability.

FWIW, whatever queue of reviewers we've lined does not, should not, and 
of course will not, preclude anyone else from offering their own review. 
  More is better.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net