Re: [dmarc-ietf] Charter improvements

Kurt Andersen <kandersen@linkedin.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=902145067=kandersen@linkedin.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA25111E80E9 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MiS6p2DcnU3Q for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esv4-mav04.corp.linkedin.com (esv4-mav04.corp.linkedin.com [69.28.149.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028C321E80A1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim1024; t=1373992539; x=1405528539; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=kQ996a/CM9Ctu+90prRmeb9Suv0+GHidyD8kEwHvYqw=; b=fk2Ex7h10txYul71xmpIwFfPzYINVixEsgV2jOiqh4AzLhURPXiv4MYj 3zWwuGDsE18dd2dV6nA4lCmKroHHlFCt34LlaKgtTHRzPjFJHotM+lFh4 H/GccPJrLpR/rU2ohDjyvPEFSl8JZQJKWx1XO6eaJbqwB/SYqXMi9pl8/ 0=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,678,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="54367923"
Received: from ESV4-HT02.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.236) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.328.11; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:35:21 -0700
Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by ESV4-HT02.linkedin.biz ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:35:21 -0700
From: Kurt Andersen <kandersen@linkedin.com>
To: "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dmarc-ietf] Charter improvements
Thread-Index: AQHOduTxI2V4I5harUK2ilq5D3M9h5lSXh6AgAB7B4CAFSOwAIAAC/aA//+OZoA=
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:35:20 +0000
Message-ID: <3560C13B3A3EC9408B4BFEDB3B72839509739F1B@ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz>
In-Reply-To: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05705787@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.253]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7D5F2C84DBD64841BCB9B45E3A1EAD2D@linkedin.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Charter improvements
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:35:51 -0000

On 2013-07-16 09:22 , "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com> wrote:

>>-----
>>* support for the notion of transitive trust (i.e., "host X trusted the
>>sender of
>>this message, and I trust X, so you should too")
>>-----
>
>Definitely have an issue with this approach. It would significantly and
>negatively impact DMARC and almost introduce opportunities for abuse.

Did you perhaps mean to say ". . .almost *certainly* introduce
opportunities for abuse"? That would be my thought on the subject as trust
has rarely been transitive.

--Kurt Andersen
  LinkedIn