Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin

Then why have a BoF at all?  It seems rather premature to discuss work beyond 
the base specification before we know what will be in the base specification.

Scott K

On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:47:50 AM Russ Housley wrote:
> Barry tells me that the base DMARC specification will be AD sponsored. 
> Therefore, the BOF will talk about work beyond the base DMARC
> specification.
> 
> Russ
> 
> On Jun 28, 2013, at 5:35 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> > On 6/28/2013 2:16 PM, John Levine wrote:
> >>> that we modify the proposed agenda as follows:
> >>> -- Summary of DMARC
> >>> -- Summary of open issues
> >>> -- Charter review
> >>> -- Hums
> >>> 
> >>> Comments? Thoughts?
> >> 
> >> This version presumes that people attending the BOF need to read the
> >> drafts first, which seems utterly reasonable.
> >> 
> >> For the charter, I think it's important for people to understand that
> >> DMARC is basically done with multiple working implementations
> >> including several at giant mail systems. (I've written one of the
> >> smaller ones.)  So the WG can certainly clean up and clarify the text,
> >> and improve the discussion of where it's useful, but it's too late
> >> to make incompatible changes to the bits on the wire.
> > 
> > This presumes that the DMARC base specification is part of the working
> > group effort.  There's been enough back and forth on this point that it's
> > probably worth clarifying it for this list.
> > 
> > To counter the suggestion not to discuss the current "Using" draft:
> > Normally a BOF will provide some commentary about documents intended as
> > input to the proposed working group.
> > 
> > 
> > d/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc