IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 02 July 2013 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD3A11E834F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.224
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.975, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XueNEflyGjwO for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E13911E834D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 77864 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2013 01:33:25 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 2 Jul 2013 01:33:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51d22de5.xn--hew.k1307; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=y7SOioHe9zAoSFFG68bokaICeJl+b6FrbPn1TwYq/c0=; b=ptkipAyTPdkw5QLbBo3RNbnRpqWZ2lo3Dcl3QZ7aaDFPPBJaPTHQKggYYpw3gXhZVrhIDg0Dvq5aumUDnN3U/cg0oNorVifEmJrQsleQPI+ajHK0grBckm+XJiDt9Zd4N2MRPuRZAKw4b63LWqa0aaapoyO91mG5oqYJIj8CBmFkE/iLI7MKDKRFLKVtycys4BfukcCPsQU+nqKzS11NOBp6+I1WRsJlhF0MXoVm2vuEkcq2oyC6eMGDfVUb75GI
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=51d22de5.xn--hew.k1307; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=y7SOioHe9zAoSFFG68bokaICeJl+b6FrbPn1TwYq/c0=; b=Z/IzE04d4wUfGmLCw/JQarRnzB6DBvIgSJ3Gnhm07CT2lHpKZjdl96StkJJ0BMtUrjWjzLf5kOelr2didTFATbpBtuA+ycGlywWn6mKFY8zFlur8+Kjd5Rxhs39RrCSCDPfpIYzhbmJkGwDQEwGAqPsULLR0NZ6xccib/+pmGq0msPJX/cWntMzI8hkaGnweQodk1El/Ol4wRmycCd/bmI2dmVDofs2Ynx9cHpsSrN9EFzoBZXQ5lmMs3hbjBiQo
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 01:33:02 -0000
Message-ID: <20130702013302.14968.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <51D20CC0.6020605@gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Cc: dcrocker@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 01:33:32 -0000

>A working group is for technical work.  We've solicited suggestions for 
>incremental technical work at least twice in two forums and there has 
>been no constituency developed for any near-term work.  If you know of 
>work to be done and can develop community support for it, please, 
>please, please document it.

If reviewing the spec is off the table, I don't see any work other
than cleaning up the BCP.

Since the dmarc.org group seems to have a working process to write
drafts adequate to publish using member employees and consultants, I
see no reason for the IETF to invest volunteer cycles on it.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email