Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 28 June 2013 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2595B21F99B7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2EzV-WrsEKXb for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0275E21F8584 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2556F2407E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:43:34 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b8jtsXLOKQdW for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:43:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.109] (pool-96-241-156-29.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.156.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEAEF24078 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:43:34 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+s610bC2epuKXvM-r3XLfwH7xTQAJqjEJHwm3Jy0b6Og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:43:25 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <377AA4D7-3202-42B9-B6D6-05510F08990D@vigilsec.com>
References: <CALaySJ+s610bC2epuKXvM-r3XLfwH7xTQAJqjEJHwm3Jy0b6Og@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC BoF at IETF 87, Berlin
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:43:32 -0000

> As some of you may have seen from the preliminary agenda, the App Area
> will have one BoF in Berlin: Domain-based Message Authentication,
> Reporting & Conformance (DMARC).  See the BoF wiki for details:
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki
> 
> The BoF is currently scheduled for Tuesday afternoon, 30 July, from
> 15:20 to 16:50 Berlin time... though that could change as the IETF
> meeting agenda is finalized.
> 
> Russ Housley (CC) has agreed to chair the BoF.  Russ is experienced
> with what's needed to have a successful BoF, and will make sure we
> stay on the right track to answer the questions we need to answer in
> order to move forward with a working group, if that's the outcome of
> the BoF.  He'll be working with the BoF proponents on the BoF agenda
> over the next weeks.
> 
> Barry, Applications AD

Thanks Barry.  I very much want the IETF to take on this work.  Fo those people that are new to this topic, by way of introduction, I was the Security AD that sponsored the DKIM BOFs and WG.

The agenda for IETF 87 is very full, and every session must be run efficiently.  I propose that we modify the proposed agenda as follows:
-- Summary of DMARC
-- Summary of open issues
-- Charter review
-- Hums


Comments? Thoughts?

Russ