IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org> Thu, 22 September 2016 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <hellekin@gnu.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634C412B854 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 04:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.243
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.243 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CTgCNvPYN0e0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 04:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [208.118.235.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABD9A12B1DF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 04:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1bn2QE-000512-CE for dnsop@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:44:13 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1bn2QE-00050u-8a for dnsop@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:44:10 -0400
Received: from tor-exit1.sjc02.svwh.net ([162.213.3.221]:34326 helo=[0.0.0.0]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1bn2QC-0002nw-Bq for dnsop@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:44:08 -0400
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAHw9_i+UVH78URWzk+4x=j9BZiKfX3C+UeFU9vz1OfZ3tPeN1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160920133357.hbvtkrg5uwgzu4wh@nic.fr> <bdc67224-ec80-0732-d338-1d8e0376e7a9@gnu.org> <CAKr6gn0Dezee9JB1g+fBKqDsg4gHjau96S-ZTC4L4xpincsOwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1n-fZyn8u4sOTu6W2sh6XSOQGxGGv31ctgE4W6JLse+Ew@mail.gmail.com> <CAKr6gn3Ny+5sZvUJAmLuyFPYVJqMtV4auFcwGA1SR5VnmDX4mw@mail.gmail.com>
From: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
Organization: https://gnu.org/consensus
Message-ID: <eeb428ce-1144-0768-7c81-98d75c929d2a@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:40:01 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn3Ny+5sZvUJAmLuyFPYVJqMtV4auFcwGA1SR5VnmDX4mw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5LRcQM9xinkNWy6fVI8UunuOruc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:44:19 -0000

On 09/22/2016 12:31 AM, George Michaelson wrote:
>
> what community burden is taken in the wide, if a new TLD is
> allocated in 6761 to break out of the DNS.
>

I'm sorry but, what do you mean 'to break out of the DNS'?

==
hk

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email