Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 30 September 2016 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91AC12B1B5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=waARzfxr; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=DSiusHvM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RPGulIyRQFqG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64F3A12B0AB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 80556 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2016 00:41:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=13aab.57edb4cd.k1609; bh=at8xpiyy/PcNMhYbyFLyKoNIX6QVEsbfcxmiM0HeX28=; b=waARzfxr0waeiI2QstDH8jOLGJl1pNq5gAsRUBqb0wIXP9MrCpyzAUEBo+Ax9Q1c0MvRNSKtHZXZ+rInwoIk+7ijj9O+hn0vn+EJZRby6YQa/MLDPybXHnrMWDwPIXqPry+K3zaMYiasR92gNzIp4xNL0Wk9ftxkbRCvBBmn5DzgG5nha9AkZKcFKbWNBpinIJ9IKnLIM2SOF5bMtabuq5z7E/xLOl4JxYi27sgbKXe94a39bx9IxW/WckjPfLYD
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=13aab.57edb4cd.k1609; bh=at8xpiyy/PcNMhYbyFLyKoNIX6QVEsbfcxmiM0HeX28=; b=DSiusHvM9/qwAwxEWeUqnivavd/WeF0IUcVsV7sC43NrB8fenc/TBrF5bDn89Kn4xlcL7Jip8cIxa0JqL53/En+JtyRdXjoaiITSpAzWsuO9XAWEyEA2a++YA2JHu4GXjymSF8myemuVdUsSTiz2323t4/J332xTOVm4SjaywS+l3Ghn4UFVX5jkWY/muMSPcohsNOmCNMquvXahgR0L1/B43xjRyaVq9JaFngiWzdSDz6lrVBYKJQWtZVJeyT4y
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 30 Sep 2016 00:41:49 -0000
Date: 29 Sep 2016 20:41:50 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609292041280.86752@ary.qy>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CMsVR-yZf_OVypMMZRfGCNE6qGs>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:41:55 -0000

>The latter, is the decision-role of ICANN. Under advisement, yes.
>respecting IETF process yes. But the mechanism as written in 6761
>vests IETF with a process outcome which specifies where the label is,
>and what value. Thats just wrong.

For some version of wrong, I suppose, but it seems a false analogy to
me.  Nobody cares if their new RRTYPE is number 666 or numbr 273, or
what IP address range they get, but a lot of people care if their TLD
or pseudo-TLD is .lksjdk or .money.

R's,
John